From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756529AbaIDD5W (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:57:22 -0400 Received: from mail4.hitachi.co.jp ([133.145.228.5]:33805 "EHLO mail4.hitachi.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755633AbaIDD5U (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:57:20 -0400 Message-ID: <5407E318.3070308@hitachi.com> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 12:57:12 +0900 From: Masami Hiramatsu Organization: Hitachi, Ltd., Japan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Namhyung Kim Cc: Shuah Khan , Tom Zanussi , Yoshihiro YUNOMAE , Oleg Nesterov , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] ftrace: Add a ftrace test collection References: <20140902110632.3207.20043.stgit@kbuild-f20.novalocal> <87iol49kd0.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> In-Reply-To: <87iol49kd0.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (2014/09/04 11:42), Namhyung Kim wrote: > On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:06:32 +0000, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Here is the collection of testcases for ftrace version 3. >> This is just some updates and fixes according to the >> discussion at previous version. >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/26/304 >> >> The major updates are: >> - Fix some expressions to work on dash (Thanks Luis!) >> - Support UNRESOLVED/UNTESTED/UNSUPPORTED results for testcase. >> Those are POSIX 1003.3 standard. >> (see http://www.gnu.org/software/dejagnu/manual/x47.html for >> more details) >> - Fix to show error logs. >> >> ftracetest is a small dash script for testing ftrace features. >> It will be required to add a unit test for each new feature >> after this is merged, because of preventing feature regressions. >> >> This version still be out of the selftest. However, at the kernel >> summit, I talked with Shuah about that. And since the kselftest >> will be the standard kernel unit test framework, I agreed to >> move this under the selftest. But I also would like to ask Steven >> and Namhyung to agree with it before moving. >> >> Actually, since we've already has similar shell-script base >> testcase under kselftest, we can easily move this under >> selftests. > > By [k]selftest, did you mean tools/testing/selftests/ ? Yes, and I will just move tools/testing/ftrace to tools/testing/selftests/ftrace and add a Makefile. > Anyway I have no objection to the move. Thank you! > > Thanks for your work! > Namhyung > -- Masami HIRAMATSU Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com