From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maarten Lankhorst Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] drm/radeon: allow asynchronous waiting on foreign fences Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 14:08:29 +0200 Message-ID: <5408563D.8010108@canonical.com> References: <54084F0E.9020500@canonical.com> <54085031.1080600@canonical.com> <540852F6.9040006@vodafone.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from youngberry.canonical.com (youngberry.canonical.com [91.189.89.112]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6A76E107 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 05:08:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <540852F6.9040006@vodafone.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: =?windows-1252?Q?Christian_K=F6nig?= , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Hey, Op 04-09-14 om 13:54 schreef Christian K=F6nig: > Am 04.09.2014 um 13:42 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >> Use the semaphore mechanism to make this happen, this uses signaling >> from the cpu instead of signaling by the gpu. > > I'm not sure if this will work reliable when the semaphores are in system= memory. We might need to reserve some VRAM for them instead. > > Regards, > Christian. Why would it be unreliable? I mostly kept it in semaphore for simplicity. ~Maarten