From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@canonical.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kvm-unit-test failures
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:11:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5408650A.8080304@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140904122444.GA7783@kernel>
Il 04/09/2014 14:24, Wanpeng Li ha scritto:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 01:33:10PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 04/09/2014 11:53, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
>>> Il 03/09/2014 20:25, Chris J Arges ha scritto:
>>>> <snip>
>>>>> I'm not sure about the reason for the warp, but indeed the offset and
>>>>> uptime match (I'll check them against the trace tomorrow) so it's "just"
>>>>> that the VM's TSC base is not taken into account correctly.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you gather another trace with the problematic patch reverted?
>>>>>
>>>>> Paolo
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here is the third trace running with 0d3da0d2 reverted from the latest
>>>> kvm queue branch 11cc9ea3:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.canonical.com/~arges/kvm/trace-3.dat.xz
>>>
>>> Thanks! And---yay!---I reproduced it on another machine.
>>
>> And my bisection landed on the merge of the timer branch (commit
>> e7fda6c4c3c1a7d6996dd75fd84670fa0b5d448f). Here is the log:
>>
>> $ git bisect bad origin/master
>> $ git bisect good v3.16
>> $ git bisect good kvm-3.17-1 # 42cbc04fd3b5e3f9b011bf9fa3ce0b3d1e10b58b
>>
>> good [ 6929.863545] loaded kvm module (v3.17-rc1-158-g451fd72219dd)
>> bad [ 6971.932790] loaded kvm module (for-linus)
>> bad [ 7216.073128] loaded kvm module (v3.16-6426-gae045e245542)
>> good [ 7286.198948] loaded kvm module (v3.16-3283-g53ee983378ff)
>> good [ 7350.534060] loaded kvm module (v3.16-rc7-1668-gaef4f5b6db65)
>> good [ 7439.037038] loaded kvm module (v3.16-4006-g91c2ff7708d4)
>> good [ 7481.188637] loaded kvm module (v3.16-rc6-450-g7ba3c21c17d0)
>> bad [ 7535.292730] loaded kvm module (v3.16-4635-ge7fda6c4c3c1)
>> good [ 7589.722691] loaded kvm module (v3.16-rc5-110-g9b0fd802e8c0)
>> good [ 7630.286418] loaded kvm module (v3.16-4467-ged5c41d30ef2)
>> good [ 7712.470986] loaded kvm module (v3.16-rc1-35-g885d078bfe92)
>> good [ 7763.443626] loaded kvm module (v3.16-rc1-381-g1b0733837a9b)
>> good [ 7825.497414] loaded kvm module (v3.16-rc5-116-g7806f60e1d20)
>> good [ 7893.174056] loaded kvm module (v3.16-rc1-384-gc6f1224573c3)
>>
>> This means that:
>>
>> - Tomasz's patch (commit 0d3da0d26e3c3515997c99451ce3b0ad1a69a36c) is
>> fine, it just enables the (wrong) master clock more often
>>
>> - the failure is within that branch.
>>
>> I then cherry-picked Tomasz's patch during a new bisection, and landed
>> on one of my original suspects:
>>
>> commit cbcf2dd3b3d4d990610259e8d878fc8dc1f17d80
>> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Date: Wed Jul 16 21:04:54 2014 +0000
>>
>> x86: kvm: Make kvm_get_time_and_clockread() nanoseconds based
>>
>> Convert the relevant base data right away to nanoseconds instead of
>> doing the conversion on every readout. Reduces text size by 160
>> bytes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>
>> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
>> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
>>
>
> Yes, I also look into this bad commit recently which lead to guest hang
> after live migration or after local save/restore.
Thanks for the report!
Wanpeng, can you test and/or review the patch I just posted ("[PATCH]
KVM: x86: fix kvmclock breakage from timers branch merge")?
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-04 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-26 18:29 [PATCH 0/2] kvm-unit-tests: add check parameter to run_tests configuration Chris J Arges
2014-08-26 18:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Chris J Arges
2014-08-27 13:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-27 14:42 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] " Chris J Arges
2014-08-27 14:45 ` [PATCH 1/2 v3] " Chris J Arges
2014-08-27 14:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-27 21:24 ` kvm-unit-test failures (was: [PATCH 1/2 v3] add check parameter to run_tests configuration) Chris J Arges
2014-08-27 22:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-29 17:36 ` kvm-unit-test failures Chris J Arges
2014-08-29 21:05 ` Chris J Arges
2014-08-31 16:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-02 19:57 ` Chris J Arges
2014-09-03 14:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-03 15:21 ` Chris J Arges
2014-09-03 14:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-03 16:23 ` Chris J Arges
2014-09-03 17:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-03 18:25 ` Chris J Arges
[not found] ` <54083688.6000201@redhat.com>
2014-09-04 11:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-04 12:24 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-09-04 13:11 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-08-29 21:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-29 21:18 ` Chris J Arges
2014-08-26 18:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/unittests.cfg: the pmu testcase requires that nmi_watchdog is disabled Chris J Arges
2014-08-27 13:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5408650A.8080304@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=chris.j.arges@canonical.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.