From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH] ip monitor: Dont print timestamp or banner-label for cloned routes Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 01:19:07 +0400 Message-ID: <5408D74B.8070204@cogentembedded.com> References: <1409856738-1938-1-git-send-email-vadim4j@gmail.com> <5408BD9F.9060107@cogentembedded.com> <5408C37C.6050104@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Vadim Kochan , Vlad Yasevich Return-path: Received: from mail-la0-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:40132 "EHLO mail-la0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754396AbaIDVTK (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:19:10 -0400 Received: by mail-la0-f46.google.com with SMTP id pv20so12654251lab.19 for ; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 14:19:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/05/2014 12:01 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote: > But here http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/ I see the v2. I'm seeing v2 on your posting as well. > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote: >> Hm thats strange I changed subject of the fixed patch to the [PATCH >> v2] form but it appeared in this thread w/o v2. The v2 is on its own thread (how it should be). >> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Vlad Yasevich wrote: >>> On 09/04/2014 03:35 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote: >>>> Thanks! >>>> Should I re-send the fixed patch with some special subject after >>>> comments/review ? >>> Typically a [PATCH v2] and so on if there are comments on v2. >>> -vlad WBR, Sergei