From: "Tetsuya.Mukawa" <mukawa-AlSX/UN32fvPDbFq/vQRIQ@public.gmane.org>
To: "Zhangkun (K)" <zhang.zhangkun-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org" <dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Are there considerations about resource recycling by the process, not by the OS?
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 18:32:05 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54098315.6080107@igel.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0FCB215400789046A95ECE23C3E46C515F958EFE-mfeVThRg90OEZbDCDsDlKQK1hpo4iccwjNknBlVQO8k@public.gmane.org>
Hi Zhangkun,
Do you talk about resource management of DPDK when a process is finished?
If so, I guess DPDK doesn't care so much about freeing resources once
allocated by the process.
For example, there is no function to free a mempool.
Thanks,
Tetsuya
(2014/09/05 12:39), Zhangkun (K) wrote:
> Hi,
> Yes, the program is running as root.
> I want to know if or not the DPDK Community considers about resource recycling.
>
> From: Masaru Oki [mailto:m-oki-kJJssGRo5Gr08ZWpFnN8/c8NsWr+9BEh@public.gmane.org]
> Date: 2014年9月5日 11:18
> To: Zhangkun (K)
> Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Are there considerations about resource recycling by the process, not by the OS?
>
> Hi,
>
> you may try
> $ gdb your_program
> gdb> b rte_panic
> gdb> run
> stopped at rte_panic
> gdb> bt
>
> sorry, it is not answer for your question.
> by the way, do you run the program as root?
>
>
> 2014-09-05 12:07 GMT+09:00 Zhangkun (K) <zhang.zhangkun-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org<mailto:zhang.zhangkun-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>>:
> Hi,
> I develop the program with the use of dpdk and the process is core dump when the program is started.
> The process is crash in case of initing memory failed and calling rte_panic function.
> I search all rte_panic function in the dpdk, and find it so many. Therefore, in case the pr ocess happen fail,
> it will abort. The resource allocated before is not released by the process, but by the OS system.
> So I have a question: Are there considerations about resource recycling by the process, not by the OS ?
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-05 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-05 3:07 Are there considerations about resource recycling by the process, not by the OS? Zhangkun (K)
[not found] ` <0FCB215400789046A95ECE23C3E46C515F958EDB-mfeVThRg90OEZbDCDsDlKQK1hpo4iccwjNknBlVQO8k@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-05 3:17 ` Masaru Oki
[not found] ` <CAFLKUzJnpYV7=fZ-hDYWTa4Ro2OfdqGe9maZM-xLnLSJmEGmnA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-05 3:39 ` Zhangkun (K)
[not found] ` <0FCB215400789046A95ECE23C3E46C515F958EFE-mfeVThRg90OEZbDCDsDlKQK1hpo4iccwjNknBlVQO8k@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-05 8:18 ` Richardson, Bruce
2014-09-05 9:32 ` Tetsuya.Mukawa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54098315.6080107@igel.co.jp \
--to=mukawa-alsx/un32fvpdbfq/vqriq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=zhang.zhangkun-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.