Re: [PATCH 0/19] lpfc 10.4.8000.0: Update lpfc version to driver version 10.4.8000.0

[James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>]

no problem, although if these rules were published, I would have tried 
to do so earlier.

although - I do have a couple of questions.


On 9/5/2014 1:35 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I've applied the series, but for next time can you make sure to follow
> the proper format:
>
>   - remove the version number in every subject line

yeah - it's long


>   - patches you resend from an original author should be unchanged,
>     except that the From: lines moves into the mail body

So.. you do not want me to resolve merge conflicts or fuzz before posting ?

note: content did not change - only merged into my git tree and re-cut them.


>   - patches that you send on with your maintainer hat on should be
>     signed off by you, not just reviewed.

ok - but I guess I had a different interpretation of the meaning for 
signed-by.  I thought it conveyed an ownership and originality of 
authorship of the content posted. As such, if I didn't contribute 
anything in the patch, I shouldn't give anything other than a 
reviewed-by indicating approval.


>
> not strictly required, but making my life a lot easier would be if all
> patches are sent by reply to the original mail.  git-send-email does
> this, and it seems like the Emulex division supporting be2scsi has found
> a way to use it with the corporate email servers.

yep - although different countries have different logistics. But, I 
should be able to get around this.

-- james