From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <540C8A35.8090804@gatech.edu> Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 12:39:17 -0400 From: "Yogi A. Patel" MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <540C85F1.4070809@gatech.edu> <540C89BC.9030508@xenomai.org> In-Reply-To: <540C89BC.9030508@xenomai.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] mlockall and dlopenskins? List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gilles Chanteperdrix , xenomai@xenomai.org On 09/07/2014 12:37 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On 09/07/2014 06:21 PM, Yogi A. Patel wrote: > The section named: MLOCKALL AND STACK SIZE says: As part of its > initialization, Xenomai libraries call mlockall to commit and lock the > whole application memory. How can that be made more clear? It might be clearer if that statement was in or referenced to by the section titled "BEFORE VERSION 2.6.3". What about the --enable-dlopen-skins warning? Are all skins compiled by default now? I'm not experiencing any problems so far, but I would rather understand what's going on than accept it blindly. Thanks, Gilles.