From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Placement Groups : chosing the right pg_num Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 23:00:31 +0200 Message-ID: <540CC76F.8010807@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pMwGhJBCLOTocDr0Nff22fM3Qj2k9x5ED" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:46897 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752010AbaIGVAo (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Sep 2014 17:00:44 -0400 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Laurent Guerby , Mehdi Abaakouk Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --pMwGhJBCLOTocDr0Nff22fM3Qj2k9x5ED Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Laurent & Mehdi, I tried to translate our discussions about how to choose the number of pl= acement groups into a revision of the documentation. Here is how it looks= at the moment: https://github.com/dachary/ceph/blob/9177da52f7aa358484f4d9074522da21c= 9336e49/doc/rados/operations/placement-groups.rst and the corresponding pull request is at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/2417 This is a draft and I would very much appreciate your comments. I cc the = Ceph development list because it is entirely possible that something sign= ificant is missing. Someone knowledgeable will hopefully rectify my mista= kes ;-) Cheers --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --pMwGhJBCLOTocDr0Nff22fM3Qj2k9x5ED Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlQMx28ACgkQ8dLMyEl6F20DzgCguCu9vUwrrbmtj8u5fy+HJqqN K7kAoK/JiY7cHk2DGfFVvBEMW4IItwE9 =cZC5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pMwGhJBCLOTocDr0Nff22fM3Qj2k9x5ED--