From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 03AE7E00847; Sun, 7 Sep 2014 18:05:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from smtp.webfaction.com (mail6.webfaction.com [74.55.86.74]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF7DE007AA for ; Sun, 7 Sep 2014 18:04:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (c-68-38-40-177.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [68.38.40.177]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1493A2117B20 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 01:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <540D00B7.5060604@mindchasers.com> Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 21:04:55 -0400 From: Bob Cochran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: 9/8 community meeting, was [RFC] The proposal of FSL QorIQ SDK upstream X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 01:05:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 07/16/2014 02:00 AM, zhenhua.luo@freescale.com wrote: > Hi all, > > Following is the proposal for FSL QorIQ SDK upstream, comment is welcome. [snip] > > More to do > • Setup public bug management system for FSL SDKs. > • Push all modules to public git repository to ensure FSL community BSP sync with FSL released SDK. > • Setup an external mailing list for external git repository for FSL SDK discussion, patch submission, patch review. > • Setup an patch management tool(patchwork or gerrit) to manage patches from community. > • Enhance the commit message in patch to facilitate the patch search for specific issue. Can we get an update on the items listed above during tomorrow's community meeting (or soon afterwards)? Also, I had previously asked about creating a branch on meta-fsl-ppc that could be used to track patches / improvements for SDK1.6 in addition to master, which I think is basically being used to set up 1.7. I need to start getting after some bugs on SDK1.6 related to various kernel oops that pop up inconsistently. I would love to see an infrastructure in place to help with this. Thanks, Bob > > > Best Regards, > > Zhenhua >