From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40034) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XQwdd-00040l-Rl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 06:57:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XQwdX-0000wp-Vs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 06:57:37 -0400 Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([86.62.121.231]:38614) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XQwdX-0000vS-MU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 06:57:31 -0400 Message-ID: <540D8B91.1060805@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 14:57:21 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1407747189-7936-1-git-send-email-zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> <1407747189-7936-11-git-send-email-zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> <20140908083754.GC7638@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20140908083754.GC7638@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 10/10] block/vvfat: fix setbuf stream parameter may be NULL List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi , zhanghailiang Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, lkurusa@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, riku.voipio@iki.fi, luonengjun@huawei.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peter.huangpeng@huawei.com, stefanha@redhat.com, Li Liu , pbonzini@redhat.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, alex.bennee@linaro.org, rth@twiddle.net 08.09.2014 12:37, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 04:53:09PM +0800, zhanghailiang wrote: >> From: Li Liu >> >> fopen() may return NULL which will cause setbuf() segmentfault [] > This no longer exists: > > commit 13b552c2f43298a42e26d7aec7b58a5c205b75a0 > Author: Michael Tokarev > Date: Wed Aug 20 19:02:38 2014 +0400 > > block/vvfat.c: remove debugging code to reinit stderr if NULL The second patch is a result of discussion emerged after first patch, consider the commit to be a follow-up for the initial patch :) Thanks, /mjt