From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XR1Eg-0005If-Vv for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 15:52:11 +0000 Received: from [172.20.7.90] (wsip-24-234-46-157.lv.lv.cox.net [24.234.46.157]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.candelatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDFDF40BE43 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 08:51:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <540DD093.5070702@candelatech.com> Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 08:51:47 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RTS threshold ignored in ath10k? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: ath10k We did some tests using ath9k and ath10k. It seems that ath10k completely ignores RTS threshold settings. I haven't had time to look into the code yet, but will try to do so next week. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k