Bug Patch

[xerofoify@gmail.com (nick)]

On 14-09-08 06:09 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 17:05:39 -0400, nick said:
> 
>> In ieee_80211_rx.c we may have a Null allocated sub in parse_subframe
>> and need to check if the allocated skb is NUll. If it is return -ENOMEM.
> 
>> +			if (!sub_skb)
>> +				return NULL;
> 
> 1) null, Null, and NULL are all OK in various contexts.  NUll isn't.
> 
> 2) the rest of the file uses 'return 0;' not 'return NULL;'
> 
> Oh, and (3)  What's wrong with this picture?
> 
> Nick, this is *exactly* the reason why *NOBODY* wants to accept code
> from you.  It's faster and more efficient for me to code the
> patch myself and stick a Reported-By: crediting you for spotting
> the bug than it takes for multiple iterations to get your patch right.
> 
> And the *reason* I'm submitting the patch myself is because every single
> problem that's been pointed out to you with this patch is something that
> has been pointed out to you before on other patches.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Thanks for at least giving me credit.
Nick