From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Clemens Ladisch Subject: Re: Master Plan on rewinding Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 15:45:35 +0200 Message-ID: <540F047F.7090607@ladisch.de> References: <540C76E0.9050808@gmail.com> <540CC53B.7080204@ladisch.de> <540D5B46.3020904@gmail.com> <540EBD9A.9000009@ladisch.de> <540EC08E.4000906@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from dehamd003.servertools24.de (dehamd003.servertools24.de [31.47.254.18]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5A126512B for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 15:45:38 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <540EC08E.4000906@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: "Alexander E. Patrakov" , ALSA Development Mailing List , Takashi Iwai , David Henningsson , Takashi Sakamoto List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > can the proposed heuristic (minimum period size for a given sample > rate, number of channels and sample format) be useful as an upper- > bound approximation of the pointer update granularity for cards that > are "rewindable even further than the nearest period"? No; USB precsion depends on the URB size, which is roughly proportional to (but smaller than) the period size. Regards, Clemens