From: Hubert CHAUMETTE <hubert.chaumette@wanadoo.fr>
To: Rajat Jain <rajatjain@juniper.net>,
"Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org" <linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org>,
kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org>
Subject: Re: x86_64_defconfig and i386_defconfig: What is the difference?
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 17:28:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <540F1CA4.9090806@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5c5bb43b899f41d0baa2d358168e9b39@DM2PR05MB671.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Le 09/09/2014 17:11, Rajat Jain a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Thank you all for your responses. I got the answer I was looking for:
>
>> Hello Rajat,
>>
>> Indeed, the i386 is for 32bits kernels, and x86_64 for 64 bits ones. If you
>> generate the configurations using "make ARCH=x86 defconfig" and "make
>> ARCH=i386 defconfig", you can easily compare the resulting configurations :
>>
>> .config from i386_defconfig :
>> #
>> # Automatically generated file; DO NOT EDIT.
>> # Linux/i386 3.17.0-rc1 Kernel Configuration # # CONFIG_64BIT is not set
>> CONFIG_X86_32=y CONFIG_X86=y CONFIG_INSTRUCTION_DECODER=y
>> CONFIG_OUTPUT_FORMAT="elf32-i386"
>> CONFIG_ARCH_DEFCONFIG="arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig"
>> ...
>>
>> .config from x86_64_defconfig :
>> #
>> # Automatically generated file; DO NOT EDIT.
>> # Linux/x86 3.17.0-rc1 Kernel Configuration # CONFIG_64BIT=y
>> CONFIG_X86_64=y CONFIG_X86=y CONFIG_INSTRUCTION_DECODER=y
>> CONFIG_OUTPUT_FORMAT="elf64-x86-64"
>> CONFIG_ARCH_DEFCONFIG="arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig"
>> ...
>>
>> As you can see, i386 is the 32 bits variant of the x86 architecture. There are of
>> course many more differences between these two configurations.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hubert
> Thanks all again,
>
> Rajat
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 7:28 AM
>> To: Matthias Brugger
>> Cc: Rajat Jain; linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org; kernelnewbies
>> Subject: Re: x86_64_defconfig and i386_defconfig: What is the difference?
>>
>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2014 16:06:07 +0200, Matthias Brugger said:
>>
>>>> Can someone tell me if the i386 one is to be used when we want to
>>>> build for a 32bit machine and the x86_64 is to be used for 64 bit machine?
>>> You can build the kernel with any architecture for any architecture.
>>> This is called cross-compiling. The homepage [0] should explain you
>>> how to do that.
>> Right, but you still need to use a .config appropriate for the target machine,
>> which is what I think Rajat was asking about.
>>
>> A defconfig is usually only known verified to boot on a few (possibly one)
>> examples of that architecture hardware. For embedded ARM, it may be one
>> specific development board or hardware device. For x86, I think they try to
>> keep it "will probably kind of sort of boot on generic PC hardware with a
>> common distro, but anything fancylike a webcam or better graphics than "vga
>> tty emulation" may not work".
>>
>> A defconfig is pretty much just a proof of concept starting point for an actual
>> working config for a given hardware system.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
Sorry, I mistakenly replied only to the OP.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-09 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-09 7:58 x86_64_defconfig and i386_defconfig: What is the difference? Rajat Jain
2014-09-09 7:58 ` Rajat Jain
2014-09-09 13:21 ` Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
2014-09-09 13:21 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2014-09-09 14:19 ` Paul Bolle
2014-09-09 14:19 ` Paul Bolle
2014-09-09 14:26 ` Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
2014-09-09 14:26 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2014-09-09 14:06 ` Matthias Brugger
2014-09-09 14:06 ` Matthias Brugger
2014-09-09 14:27 ` Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
2014-09-09 14:27 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2014-09-09 14:34 ` Abreu, Ian
2014-09-09 14:34 ` Abreu, Ian
2014-09-09 15:11 ` Rajat Jain
2014-09-09 15:11 ` Rajat Jain
2014-09-09 15:28 ` Hubert CHAUMETTE [this message]
2014-09-09 17:51 ` Rajat Jain
2014-09-09 17:51 ` Rajat Jain
2014-09-13 1:10 ` Peter Teoh
2014-09-13 1:10 ` Peter Teoh
2014-09-13 3:44 ` Rajat Jain
2014-09-13 3:44 ` Rajat Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=540F1CA4.9090806@wanadoo.fr \
--to=hubert.chaumette@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org \
--cc=linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=rajatjain@juniper.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.