From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suman Anna Subject: Re: [PATCHv10 0/4] Common Mailbox Framework Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 11:23:54 -0500 Message-ID: <540F299A.6030906@ti.com> References: <1406896194-4667-1-git-send-email-jaswinder.singh@linaro.org> <20140801182656.GJ30458@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jassi Brar , Mark Brown Cc: Devicetree List , lkml , "ks.giri-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org" , Arnd Bergmann , "ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org" , Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Courtney Cavin , Matt Porter , Craig McGeachie , LeyFoon Tan , Loic Pallardy , Ashwin Chaugule , Bjorn Andersson , Patch Tracking , Mollie Wu , Tetsuya Takinishi , Kevin Hilman , Lee Jones , Andy Green , Tony Lindgren List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Jassi, On 08/02/2014 02:48 AM, Jassi Brar wrote: > On 1 August 2014 23:56, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 05:59:54PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote: >>> Hello, >>> Here's v10. Not much different from v9. The code and the generic >>> bindings looked good enough to relevant gods, but the patchset still >>> needs some formal loving in the form of Acked-by's. >>> >>> Changes since v9: >>> o Purely cosmetic changes - added headers and used BIT() >> >> Given that this code is now getting very stable can I suggest setting up >> a git tree and making sure it's included in -next? Just send Stephen a >> mail with a pointer to the relevant tree and branch and ask him to add it. >> >> I'd say it's probably worth merging at this point though since it's not >> been in -next yet and the merge window is likely to open this weekend it >> might be a bit much to try to merge it this window. >> > Thanks, sounds good. Will do. Is there anything pending on this series to make it into 3.18? This is one of the dependencies for our AM335/AM437 PM suspend support, so it would be great to see this in 3.18, so that we can target 3.19 for the PM series. regards Suman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757436AbaIIQYg (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2014 12:24:36 -0400 Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:38069 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757157AbaIIQYe (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2014 12:24:34 -0400 Message-ID: <540F299A.6030906@ti.com> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 11:23:54 -0500 From: Suman Anna User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jassi Brar , Mark Brown CC: Devicetree List , lkml , "ks.giri@samsung.com" , Arnd Bergmann , "ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk" , Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Courtney Cavin , Matt Porter , Craig McGeachie , LeyFoon Tan , Loic Pallardy , Ashwin Chaugule , Bjorn Andersson , Patch Tracking , Mollie Wu , Tetsuya Takinishi , Kevin Hilman , Lee Jones , Andy Green , Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCHv10 0/4] Common Mailbox Framework References: <1406896194-4667-1-git-send-email-jaswinder.singh@linaro.org> <20140801182656.GJ30458@sirena.org.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jassi, On 08/02/2014 02:48 AM, Jassi Brar wrote: > On 1 August 2014 23:56, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 05:59:54PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote: >>> Hello, >>> Here's v10. Not much different from v9. The code and the generic >>> bindings looked good enough to relevant gods, but the patchset still >>> needs some formal loving in the form of Acked-by's. >>> >>> Changes since v9: >>> o Purely cosmetic changes - added headers and used BIT() >> >> Given that this code is now getting very stable can I suggest setting up >> a git tree and making sure it's included in -next? Just send Stephen a >> mail with a pointer to the relevant tree and branch and ask him to add it. >> >> I'd say it's probably worth merging at this point though since it's not >> been in -next yet and the merge window is likely to open this weekend it >> might be a bit much to try to merge it this window. >> > Thanks, sounds good. Will do. Is there anything pending on this series to make it into 3.18? This is one of the dependencies for our AM335/AM437 PM suspend support, so it would be great to see this in 3.18, so that we can target 3.19 for the PM series. regards Suman