From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35969) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XROOW-0004ya-S3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 12:35:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XROOR-0001az-TV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 12:35:52 -0400 Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com ([194.213.3.17]:28000) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XROOR-0001aD-LQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 12:35:47 -0400 Message-ID: <540F2C42.9060307@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 18:35:14 +0200 From: Claudio Fontana MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1405063270-18902-1-git-send-email-a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com> <53BFAE4A.7070609@virtualopensystems.com> In-Reply-To: <53BFAE4A.7070609@virtualopensystems.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/8] Add Generic PCI host device update List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alvise Rigo , Peter Maydell Cc: Rob Herring , "tech@virtualopensystems.com" , QEMU Developers On 11.07.2014 11:28, Alvise Rigo wrote: > The kernel version is a very recent one: v3.16.0-rc1. > Maybe you are right. I will test some older version to see if I'm able > to reproduce the issue. > > Thank you, > alvise Any news on this? I will be soon in the situation when I can start testing these as the way to get PCI working in OSv for AArch64, but will require a bit more time, since there is some more mechanical work involved. Ciao, Claudio > Il 11/07/2014 11:09, Peter Maydell ha scritto: >> On 11 July 2014 08:21, Alvise Rigo wrote: >>> This work has been tested attaching several PCI devices to the mach-virt >>> platform. The tested devices are: virtio-blk-pci, virtio-net-pci, >>> lsi53c895a and pci-ohci (all attached at the same time). >>> Even if the original work was not changed in its core functionalities, I >>> couldn't reproduce the malfunctioning of the LSI SCSI mentioned in [1]. >>> After attaching several qcow2 images, formatting and filling them, I >>> didn't notice anything wrong. Am I missing something? >> >> Interesting. Perhaps the bug was on the kernel side; which >> guest kernel version are you using to test with? >> >> thanks >> -- PMM >> >