From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/21] xen/arm: Initialize the virtual
	GIC later
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 11:57:27 -0700
Message-ID: <540F4D97.5020202@linaro.org>
References: <1406818852-31856-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org>	
	<1406818852-31856-9-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org>	
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1408061629340.2293@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
	<1410269732.8217.181.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <julien.grall@linaro.org>) id 1XRQbd-00066a-GB
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 18:57:33 +0000
Received: by mail-qc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id r5so18458626qcx.1
	for <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>;
	Tue, 09 Sep 2014 11:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1410269732.8217.181.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>, tim@xen.org, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Hi Ian,

On 09/09/14 06:35, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 16:35 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
>>> +#if defined(__arm__) || defined(__arch64__)
>>> +int xc_domain_configure(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t domid,
>>> +                        uint32_t nr_spis)
>>
>> Given that we'll likely add new fields to xen_domctl_configuredomain, I
>> think it is best if we pass a struct domain_configure to
>> xc_domain_configure instead of nr_spis. The struct we pass to
>> xc_domain_configure doesn't have to be identical to struct
>> xen_domctl_configuredomain, but at the moment it would be.
>
> In that case you may as well inline the domctl call into
> arch_domain_create_pre, which I don't think is a bad idea.

It will be hard. Libxl doesn't have access to the facility for create 
bounce buffer...

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall