From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Javier Martinez Canillas Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: dts: Add Peach Pit and Pi dts entry for ISL29018 sensor Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:02:38 +0200 Message-ID: <541013AE.6090805@collabora.co.uk> References: <1408533593-32346-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <1408533593-32346-6-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([93.93.135.160]:35236 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751048AbaIJJCo (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 05:02:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Doug Anderson Cc: Kukjin Kim , Olof Johansson , Mark Brown , Naveen Krishna Chatradhi , Rahul Sharma , =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= , linux-samsung-soc , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Hello Doug, On 09/10/2014 06:52 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: > > I would note that the downstream dts file has this i2c bus at 400kHz. > ...but that's not a problem with your patch. Perhaps you could submit > that as a separate patch? > Indeed, I've to re-spin anyways so I'll include that on the next version as a separate patch. > Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson > Best regards, Javier From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk (Javier Martinez Canillas) Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:02:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: dts: Add Peach Pit and Pi dts entry for ISL29018 sensor In-Reply-To: References: <1408533593-32346-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <1408533593-32346-6-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> Message-ID: <541013AE.6090805@collabora.co.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello Doug, On 09/10/2014 06:52 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: > > I would note that the downstream dts file has this i2c bus at 400kHz. > ...but that's not a problem with your patch. Perhaps you could submit > that as a separate patch? > Indeed, I've to re-spin anyways so I'll include that on the next version as a separate patch. > Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson > Best regards, Javier