* [PATCH] libceph: fix a memory leak in handle_watch_notify @ 2014-09-11 0:20 roy.qing.li 2014-09-11 1:41 ` Alex Elder 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: roy.qing.li @ 2014-09-11 0:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: sage, ceph-devel From: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@gmail.com> event_work should be freed when adding it to queue failed Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@gmail.com> --- net/ceph/osd_client.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/net/ceph/osd_client.c b/net/ceph/osd_client.c index 30f6faf..1e1b4f1 100644 --- a/net/ceph/osd_client.c +++ b/net/ceph/osd_client.c @@ -2323,6 +2323,7 @@ static void handle_watch_notify(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc, event_work->opcode = opcode; if (!queue_work(osdc->notify_wq, &event_work->work)) { dout("WARNING: failed to queue notify event work\n"); + kfree(event_work); goto done_err; } } -- 1.7.10.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] libceph: fix a memory leak in handle_watch_notify 2014-09-11 0:20 [PATCH] libceph: fix a memory leak in handle_watch_notify roy.qing.li @ 2014-09-11 1:41 ` Alex Elder 2014-09-11 8:31 ` Ilya Dryomov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Alex Elder @ 2014-09-11 1:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: roy.qing.li, sage, ceph-devel On 09/10/2014 07:20 PM, roy.qing.li@gmail.com wrote: > From: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@gmail.com> > > event_work should be freed when adding it to queue failed > > Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@gmail.com> Looks good. Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> > --- > net/ceph/osd_client.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/net/ceph/osd_client.c b/net/ceph/osd_client.c > index 30f6faf..1e1b4f1 100644 > --- a/net/ceph/osd_client.c > +++ b/net/ceph/osd_client.c > @@ -2323,6 +2323,7 @@ static void handle_watch_notify(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc, > event_work->opcode = opcode; > if (!queue_work(osdc->notify_wq, &event_work->work)) { > dout("WARNING: failed to queue notify event work\n"); > + kfree(event_work); > goto done_err; > } > } > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] libceph: fix a memory leak in handle_watch_notify 2014-09-11 1:41 ` Alex Elder @ 2014-09-11 8:31 ` Ilya Dryomov 2014-09-11 10:50 ` Alex Elder 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Ilya Dryomov @ 2014-09-11 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alex Elder; +Cc: roy.qing.li, Sage Weil, Ceph Development On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Alex Elder <elder@ieee.org> wrote: > On 09/10/2014 07:20 PM, roy.qing.li@gmail.com wrote: >> >> From: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@gmail.com> >> >> event_work should be freed when adding it to queue failed >> >> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@gmail.com> > > > Looks good. > > Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Hmm, queue_work() returns %false if @work was already on a queue, %true otherwise, so this seems bogus to me. I'd go with something like this (mangled). From c0711eee447b199b1c2193460fce8c9d958f23f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ilya Dryomov <ilya.dryomov@inktank.com> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:18:53 +0400 Subject: [PATCH] libceph: don't try checking queue_work() return value queue_work() doesn't "fail to queue", it returns false if work was already on a queue, which can't happen here since we allocate event_work right before we queue it. So don't bother at all. Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <ilya.dryomov@inktank.com> --- net/ceph/osd_client.c | 15 +++++---------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ceph/osd_client.c b/net/ceph/osd_client.c index 0f569d322405..952e9c254cc7 100644 --- a/net/ceph/osd_client.c +++ b/net/ceph/osd_client.c @@ -2355,26 +2355,21 @@ static void handle_watch_notify(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc, if (event) { event_work = kmalloc(sizeof(*event_work), GFP_NOIO); if (!event_work) { - dout("ERROR: could not allocate event_work\n"); - goto done_err; + pr_err("couldn't allocate event_work\n"); + ceph_osdc_put_event(event); + return; } INIT_WORK(&event_work->work, do_event_work); event_work->event = event; event_work->ver = ver; event_work->notify_id = notify_id; event_work->opcode = opcode; - if (!queue_work(osdc->notify_wq, &event_work->work)) { - dout("WARNING: failed to queue notify event work\n"); - goto done_err; - } + + queue_work(osdc->notify_wq, &event_work->work); } return; -done_err: - ceph_osdc_put_event(event); - return; - bad: pr_err("osdc handle_watch_notify corrupt msg\n"); } -- 1.7.10.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] libceph: fix a memory leak in handle_watch_notify 2014-09-11 8:31 ` Ilya Dryomov @ 2014-09-11 10:50 ` Alex Elder 2014-09-11 11:11 ` Ilya Dryomov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Alex Elder @ 2014-09-11 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ilya Dryomov; +Cc: roy.qing.li, Sage Weil, Ceph Development On 09/11/2014 03:31 AM, Ilya Dryomov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Alex Elder <elder@ieee.org> wrote: >> On 09/10/2014 07:20 PM, roy.qing.li@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>> From: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@gmail.com> >>> >>> event_work should be freed when adding it to queue failed >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@gmail.com> >> >> >> Looks good. >> >> Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> > > Hmm, queue_work() returns %false if @work was already on a queue, %true > otherwise, so this seems bogus to me. I'd go with something like this > (mangled). The original change was fine. Whether it matters is another question. Your suggestion looks good as well, and on the assumption that if you choose to use it instead your "real" fix is done correctly you can use "Reviewed-by: <me>" if you like. -Alex > > From c0711eee447b199b1c2193460fce8c9d958f23f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ilya Dryomov <ilya.dryomov@inktank.com> > Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:18:53 +0400 > Subject: [PATCH] libceph: don't try checking queue_work() return value > > queue_work() doesn't "fail to queue", it returns false if work was > already on a queue, which can't happen here since we allocate > event_work right before we queue it. So don't bother at all. > > Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <ilya.dryomov@inktank.com> > --- > net/ceph/osd_client.c | 15 +++++---------- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/ceph/osd_client.c b/net/ceph/osd_client.c > index 0f569d322405..952e9c254cc7 100644 > --- a/net/ceph/osd_client.c > +++ b/net/ceph/osd_client.c > @@ -2355,26 +2355,21 @@ static void handle_watch_notify(struct > ceph_osd_client *osdc, > if (event) { > event_work = kmalloc(sizeof(*event_work), GFP_NOIO); > if (!event_work) { > - dout("ERROR: could not allocate event_work\n"); > - goto done_err; > + pr_err("couldn't allocate event_work\n"); > + ceph_osdc_put_event(event); > + return; > } > INIT_WORK(&event_work->work, do_event_work); > event_work->event = event; > event_work->ver = ver; > event_work->notify_id = notify_id; > event_work->opcode = opcode; > - if (!queue_work(osdc->notify_wq, &event_work->work)) { > - dout("WARNING: failed to queue notify event work\n"); > - goto done_err; > - } > + > + queue_work(osdc->notify_wq, &event_work->work); > } > > return; > > -done_err: > - ceph_osdc_put_event(event); > - return; > - > bad: > pr_err("osdc handle_watch_notify corrupt msg\n"); > } > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] libceph: fix a memory leak in handle_watch_notify 2014-09-11 10:50 ` Alex Elder @ 2014-09-11 11:11 ` Ilya Dryomov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Ilya Dryomov @ 2014-09-11 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alex Elder; +Cc: roy.qing.li, Sage Weil, Ceph Development On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Alex Elder <elder@ieee.org> wrote: > On 09/11/2014 03:31 AM, Ilya Dryomov wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Alex Elder <elder@ieee.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 09/10/2014 07:20 PM, roy.qing.li@gmail.com wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> From: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> event_work should be freed when adding it to queue failed >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@gmail.com> >>> >>> >>> >>> Looks good. >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> >> >> >> Hmm, queue_work() returns %false if @work was already on a queue, %true >> otherwise, so this seems bogus to me. I'd go with something like this >> (mangled). > > > The original change was fine. Whether it matters is another question. > Your suggestion looks good as well, and on the assumption that if you > choose to use it instead your "real" fix is done correctly you can > use "Reviewed-by: <me>" if you like. Well, the original change makes something bogus even more bogus. It's basically: foo = kmalloc(...); foo->bar = 0; if (foo->bar & BAZ) { /* WARNING */ kfree(foo); goto ... } So yeah, I'm going to use your Reviewed-by on my "real" fix ;) Thanks, Ilya ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-11 11:11 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-09-11 0:20 [PATCH] libceph: fix a memory leak in handle_watch_notify roy.qing.li 2014-09-11 1:41 ` Alex Elder 2014-09-11 8:31 ` Ilya Dryomov 2014-09-11 10:50 ` Alex Elder 2014-09-11 11:11 ` Ilya Dryomov
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.