From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [XEN/ARM PATCH v6 1/1] Add OdroidXU board (Exynos
	5410)
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:36:36 -0700
Message-ID: <5411EBB4.4000700@linaro.org>
References: <1409871443-15641-1-git-send-email-suriyan.r@gmail.com>	
	<1410171636.10156.148.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>	
	<CANoR_OCtwM0=gdriVCa7V=O34Rzta5mOhvZ=BbJNdUBv9a6_XQ@mail.gmail.com>	
	<5410CF05.9070403@linaro.org>	
	<CANoR_OCXow=7aUXR+0ZWd+2HZ4UP2-g7P8vK6eZS_C1-MiWjzg@mail.gmail.com>	
	<5410F4D5.9000503@linaro.org>	
	<CANoR_ODq-UK1t8pVj8zHGasqNHnZFOtr4vNySEGb6Jqj1dGGPg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1410440292.25388.19.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <1410440292.25388.19.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, Suriyan Ramasami <suriyan.r@gmail.com>
Cc: keir@xen.org, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>, ian.jackson@citrix.com, Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Hi Ian,

On 11/09/14 05:58, Ian Campbell wrote:
> I think what you suggest sounds plausible. For me the following fixes
> boot on my arndale (I mistakenly thought that it worked earlier but I
> was testing the wrong thing). If the presence of samsung,secure-firmware
> is the way to distinguish the two cases then lets go that way.
>
> Since arndale is used in automated tests I'm inclined towards applying
> this patch until a solution is found to detect the Odroid case.
> -----8<--------------
>
>  From 24f74cbb981689b37d6bf83978c628a9fbabe246 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:55:08 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] xen: arm: fix boot on arndale.
>
> The differences between Arndale and the Odoid-XU are more interesting
> than first though, which results in 0bf8ddecb4df "xen/arm: Add
> support for the Odroid-XU board." breaking boot on arndale.
>
> Revert back to arndale compatible behaviour while we sort this out.
> Specifically we must (counterintuitively) use the regular (!ns)
> sysram and the correct offset is 0x0 and 0x1c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>

Also I will give a look to the fix up patch ("Unbreak Arndale XEN Boot") 
today.

Regards,
-- 
Julien Grall