From: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>
To: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@avagotech.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
"Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott@hp.com>,
Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@avagotech.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
jbottomley@parallels.com, aradford <aradford@gmail.com>,
Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>,
amirv@mellanox.com, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] megaraid_sas : Firmware crash dump feature support
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:58:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5411F0C5.2040209@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHsXFKH2REAYauW5=Tp=eqaeBxve6rZU3ocXcnpVg2P=72VTQw@mail.gmail.com>
On 09/11/2014 06:39 PM, Kashyap Desai wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 09/11/2014 11:02 AM, Kashyap Desai wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Vivek Goyal [mailto:vgoyal@redhat.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 9:17 PM
>>>> To: Tomas Henzl
>>>> Cc: Elliott, Robert (Server Storage); Sumit Saxena;
>>> linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org;
>>>> martin.petersen@oracle.com; hch@infradead.org;
>>>> jbottomley@parallels.com; Kashyap Desai; aradford@gmail.com; Michal
>>>> Schmidt; amirv@mellanox.com; Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
>>>> (axboe@kernel.dk); scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] megaraid_sas : Firmware crash dump feature
>>>> support
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 05:28:40PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
>>>>> On 09/10/2014 05:06 PM, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) wrote:
>>>>>>> From: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-scsi-
>>>>>>> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Sumit Saxena
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From: Tomas Henzl [mailto:thenzl@redhat.com]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> With several controllers in a system this may take a lot memory,
>>>>>>>> could you also in case when a kdump kernel is running lower it, by
>>>>>>>> not using this feature?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Agreed, we will disable this feature for kdump kernel by adding
>>>>>>> "reset_devices" global varaiable.
>>>>>>> That check is required for only one place, throughout the code,
>>>>>>> this feature will remain disabled. Code snippet for the same-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> instance->crash_dump_drv_support = (!reset_devices) &&
>>>>>>> crashdump_enable &&
>>>>>>> instance->crash_dump_fw_support &&
>>>>>>> instance->crash_dump_buf);
>>>>>>> if(instance->crash_dump_drv_support) {
>>>>>>> printk(KERN_INFO "megaraid_sas: FW Crash dump is
>>>>>>> supported\n");
>>>>>>> megasas_set_crash_dump_params(instance,
>>>>>>> MR_CRASH_BUF_TURN_OFF);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> } else {
>>>>>>> ..
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>> Network drivers have been running into similar problems.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's a new patch from Amir coming through net-next to make
>>>>>> is_kdump_kernel() (in crash_dump.h) accessible to modules.
>>>>>> That may be a better signal than reset_devices that the driver
>>>>>> should use minimal resources.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/324737
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure about the logistics of a SCSI patch depending on a
>>>>>> net-next patch.
>>>>> Probably better to start with reset_devices and switch to
>>>>> is_kdump_kernel() later.
>>>>> This is not a discussion about reset_devices versus is_kdump_kernel,
>>>>> but while it looks good to have it distinguished - is the
>>>>> reset_devices actually used anywhere else than in kdump kernel?
>>>> I think usage of reset_devices for lowering memory footprint of driver
>>> is
>>>> plain wrong. It tells driver to only reset the device as BIOS might not
>>> have
>>>> done it right or we skipped BIOS completely.
>>>>
>>>> Using is_kdump_kernel() is also not perfect either but atleast better
>>> than
>>>> reset_devices.
>>> We will use is_kdump_kernel() not to enable this feature in Kdump kernel.
>> OK, just keep in mind that the is_kdump_kernel() is not yet in mainline.
> Sure I read that part, but when I check kernel source I found
> is_kdump_kernel() is available.
>
> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/include/linux/crash_dump.h#L55
> Let's do one thing - We will submit a separate patch for this to avoid
> any confusion.
>
>
>>> MegaRaid Driver will not allocate Host memory (which is used to collect
>>> complete FW crash image) until and unless associated FW is crashed/IO
>>> timeout.
>> This is new for the driver? A previous reply stated that the driver will
>> allocate 1MB for each MR controller at the 'start of the day'.
>> If I misunderstood it somehow then nothing is needed.
> This is correct. 1MB DMA buffer per controller will be allocated
> irrespective of FW is crashed or not.
> When FW actually crash driver will go and try to allocate upto 512MB
> memory. I though you queried for 512 MB memory.
Memory allocated for a crashkernel depends on system configuration,
values below 100MB are often used - the less the better.
Every MB counts.
>
>>> Driver do allocation only if required. Also, it will break the function
>>> immediately after memory allocation is failed and operate on available
>>> memory.
>>>
>>> To be on safer side, we can disable this feature in Kdump mode.
>>>
>>> ~ Kashyap
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Vivek
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-11 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-06 13:25 [PATCH 04/11] megaraid_sas : Firmware crash dump feature support Sumit.Saxena
2014-09-09 15:54 ` Tomas Henzl
2014-09-09 16:18 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2014-09-10 10:08 ` Tomas Henzl
2014-09-10 12:12 ` Sumit Saxena
2014-09-10 15:06 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2014-09-10 15:28 ` Tomas Henzl
2014-09-10 15:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-09-11 9:02 ` Kashyap Desai
2014-09-11 11:20 ` Tomas Henzl
2014-09-11 16:39 ` Kashyap Desai
2014-09-11 17:02 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-09-11 18:58 ` Tomas Henzl [this message]
2014-09-11 19:11 ` Kashyap Desai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5411F0C5.2040209@redhat.com \
--to=thenzl@redhat.com \
--cc=Elliott@hp.com \
--cc=amirv@mellanox.com \
--cc=aradford@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=kashyap.desai@avagotech.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mschmidt@redhat.com \
--cc=scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com \
--cc=sumit.saxena@avagotech.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.