From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id CF670E00799; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 08:51:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from smtp.twobit.us (smtp.twobit.us [38.83.192.235]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD1DE006DB for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 08:51:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [50.153.135.139] (helo=[172.16.1.11]) by smtp.twobit.us with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XST2N-0004lo-7D; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:45:27 +0000 Message-ID: <54131665.6090909@twobit.us> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:51:01 -0400 From: Philip Tricca User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Xin.Ouyang@windriver.com References: <1410177817-19839-1-git-send-email-flihp@twobit.us> In-Reply-To: <1410177817-19839-1-git-send-email-flihp@twobit.us> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 50.153.135.139 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: flihp@twobit.us X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on smtp.twobit.us) Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-selinux][PATCH 0/3] Version number cleanup X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:51:19 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Xin, Just noticed that you pushed these patches to the meta-selinux repo but with your name and a slightly different commit message in one case. Other than forgetting to copy you on my initial message to the list was there a problem with my patches? Just want to be sure that the next time I send out patches I get them right if there was in fact an issue with these ones. Thanks, Philip On 09/08/2014 08:03 AM, Philip Tricca wrote: > Patch set to use wildcards in the version numbers of the at and shadow > bbappends and to remove the 3.4 kernel bbappend. > > Philip Tricca (3): > shadow: Use wildcard for version number in bbappend. > at: Use wildcard for version number in bbappend. > linux-yocto: Remove bbappend for old 3.4 kernel. > > recipes-extended/at/at_%.bbappend | 7 +++++++ > recipes-extended/at/at_3.1.14.bbappend | 7 ------- > recipes-extended/shadow/shadow_%.bbappend | 5 +++++ > recipes-extended/shadow/shadow_4.1.4.3.bbappend | 5 ----- > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.4.bbappend | 7 ------- > 5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 recipes-extended/at/at_%.bbappend > delete mode 100644 recipes-extended/at/at_3.1.14.bbappend > create mode 100644 recipes-extended/shadow/shadow_%.bbappend > delete mode 100644 recipes-extended/shadow/shadow_4.1.4.3.bbappend > delete mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.4.bbappend >