All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: andrea.merello@gmail.com,
	Bernhard Schiffner <bernhard@schiffner-limbach.de>
Cc: ralf@czekalla.com, Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com>,
	Linux Wireless List <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: Rtl8187se regression [was: rtl8187se - serious regressions since merge out of staging into 818x]
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:52:02 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <541324B2.7040200@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN8YU5OHAmYp-7Ojti3aSeGWJr=dU0Xb=Du_w_QqPUezno_=DQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 09/12/2014 11:29 AM, Andrea Merello wrote:
>> Because of the problems I'am going now to a special site, where I have a local
>> networks (LAN/WLAN), good internet connection and root access to Linux
>> machines.
>> This should be a good thing to do real testing.
>
> Excellent!
> Thank you Bernhard!
>
>> 1.) Andrea, can you resend me the latest patches (perhaps against 3.16)
>> please?
>> (only to confirm that we are in "synchronous" mode.)
>
> Sure, I attach a cumulative patch, including all the changes I think
> may matter (signal strength fix not included)
>
>> 2.) Andrea, Larry, John are you interested to have root access to my laptop
>> using the rtl8187se?
>> (Perhaps it can stay there over the weekend too.)
>
> Thank you for offering this :)
> In case it turns out that you actually face performance regressions,
> then it might help me to make some experiments using your machine.
>
> I will do a register dump and I will try to tune some parameters in
> the driver. This should NOT crash the machine, but if it is vital for
> you that the machine remains alive, then maybe I will avoid at least
> certain experiments..
>
> Possibly tomorrow afternoon (Italian time) I will have some spare time
> to work on this.
>
>> 3.) My test for maximal troughput is to run a connection /dev/zero -> nc ->|->
>> nc -> /dev/null.
>> Any other ideas?
>
> Usually I use two Linux hosts (the DUT and my production system) and I
> use "iperf" program on both
> On the production system (the iperf server) I run
> iperf -s -u -b30M
> On the DUT I run
> iperf -c 192.168.1.2 -r -u -b30M
>
> This will cause an UDP data exchange and will perform both downstream
> and upstream throughput measurements.
> I usually do this (at least) two times, and I discard results from the
> first run, because rate selection algorithm might eventually need a
> bit settle to a "good" rate.
>
>> 4.) I think to have this setup ready about 11:30 UTC.
>
> I was at my workplace, I really couldn't do quicker than this..
> Sorry.. I hope we are still in time...
>
>> I'am open to any suggestion from your side.
>
> Tests that may also help are:
> - test performance regression when you are both close to the AP and
> enough far from it that performances significantly drops.
> - check if the rtl818x_pci driver and the old driver settles at
> (about) the same rates..

Hi,

I currently have a deadline to get some changes in rtlwifi into kernel 3.16, 
thus I have no time for testing the RTL8187SE. I do know that the whole issue of 
signal strength reporting for these chips is a problem.

Larry


      reply	other threads:[~2014-09-12 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAN8YU5NOApnft04+N3rSQF3j9d9N47-A6m4n-1-2KNHq+1EYKA@mail.gmail.com>
2014-09-12  7:47 ` Rtl8187se regression [was: rtl8187se - serious regressions since merge out of staging into 818x] Bernhard Schiffner
2014-09-12 16:29   ` Andrea Merello
2014-09-12 16:52     ` Larry Finger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=541324B2.7040200@lwfinger.net \
    --to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=andrea.merello@gmail.com \
    --cc=bernhard@schiffner-limbach.de \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=ralf@czekalla.com \
    --cc=xose.vazquez@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.