From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: xjq@rock-chips.com (Jianqun) Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:00:50 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 0/2] rockchip-max98090: add driver for rockchip board with max98090 In-Reply-To: <20140912134234.GS7960@sirena.org.uk> References: <1410506806-15327-1-git-send-email-jay.xu@rock-chips.com> <20140912134234.GS7960@sirena.org.uk> Message-ID: <541504E2.3050200@rock-chips.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org ? 09/12/2014 09:42 PM, Mark Brown ??: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 03:26:46PM +0800, Jianqun wrote: >> This patch to add driver for rockchip board using a max98090. >> >> Tested on RK3288 using a max98090. > > This appears to have two slightly different copies of the patches > threaded to it... that's a bit confusing. > So sorry for all in the mail thread, I have made a stupid thing ~ since I made many patches at a meantime ~ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jianqun Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] rockchip-max98090: add driver for rockchip board with max98090 Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:00:50 +0800 Message-ID: <541504E2.3050200@rock-chips.com> References: <1410506806-15327-1-git-send-email-jay.xu@rock-chips.com> <20140912134234.GS7960@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140912134234.GS7960@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown , Jianqun Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, heiko@sntech.de, lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.de, grant.likely@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, huangtao@rock-chips.com, cf@rock-chips.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org =E5=9C=A8 09/12/2014 09:42 PM, Mark Brown =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 03:26:46PM +0800, Jianqun wrote: >> This patch to add driver for rockchip board using a max98090. >> >> Tested on RK3288 using a max98090. >=20 > This appears to have two slightly different copies of the patches > threaded to it... that's a bit confusing. >=20 So sorry for all in the mail thread, I have made a stupid thing ~ since= I made many patches at a meantime ~