Re: [Xenomai] Question regarding rt_sem_p

[Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>]

On 09/14/2014 05:27 AM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 09/14/2014 04:44 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:54:21PM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> On 09/12/2014 10:52 PM, PRADHAN, MAKARAND (RC-CA) wrote:
>>>> Small correction:
>>>>
>>>> The ipipe patch that we are using is derived from ipipe-3.12.0 branch.
>>>
>>> This means a patch that has not even been tested. It just fixes merge
>>> conflicts, and has been compile checked, it has not run on real
>>> hardware. The one which has been tested on real hardware is the I-pipe
>>> patch for 3.14.0 or 3.14.17.
>>
>> Well 3.12 did pass the xenomai testsuite.
>>
>> Unfortunately TI isn't quite done moving their patches to the 3.14
>> branch yet, so we are still stuck at 3.12 (And the 3.8 branch was way
>> too unstable to use for anything at all even before considering xenomai).
>> Problem with new chips is that they aren't merged into the official
>> kernel yet, so jumping to a new kernel version isn't trivial.
>>
>> I will be checking if the 3.14 branch has enough to boot on Monday
>> (A lot of stuff was merged in yesterday so it might be getting close now).
>>
> I am almost sure I fixed an issue with user-space getting -EINTR with
> gdb. I simply did not want to look for the commit if you still have the
> issue with 3.14. If 3.14 does not boot, it looks like I will have to
> search the commit anyway.
> 

Could be this one, which also fixed a spurious assertion trigger:
http://git.xenomai.org/ipipe.git/commit/?h=ipipe-3.14&id=d7a5e4762535f55bfff8eafbf1c1dde214d09bd6

-- 
Philippe.