From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Using the tlb flush util function where applicable
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:56:28 +0200
Message-ID: <5417FB3C.2070104@redhat.com>
References: <1410556005-15639-1-git-send-email-liangchen.linux@gmail.com> <20140915193351.GA3356@potion.brq.redhat.com> <54176CE6.3080006@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>,
	=?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:9754 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752705AbaIPI4c (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 16 Sep 2014 04:56:32 -0400
In-Reply-To: <54176CE6.3080006@gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Il 16/09/2014 00:49, Liang Chen ha scritto:
>> > ---
>> > (And what about a possible followup patch that replaces
>> >  kvm_mmu_flush_tlb() with kvm_make_request() again?
>> >  It would free the namespace a bit and we could call something
>> >  similarly named from vcpu_enter_guest() to do the job.)
> That seems good. I can take the labor to make the followup patch ;)

Ok, so I'll not apply your first patch.

Thanks!

Paolo