From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ptmx.org (ptmx.org [178.63.28.110]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4D26AFB5 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.14] (chello062178118086.5.14.vie.surfer.at [62.178.118.86]) by ptmx.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E05E26902; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:11:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5417FED2.1030106@pseudoterminal.org> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:11:46 +0200 From: Carlos Rafael Giani User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Khem Raj , openembeded-devel References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: mpg123 recipe LICENSE_FLAGS = "commercial" issue X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:11:48 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2014-09-16 07:43, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi Carlos/All > > I want to understand why LICENSE_FLAGS = "commercial" was added to > > meta-multimedia/recipes-multimedia/mpg123/mpg123_1.15.3.bb > > in initial commit and has been carried over upgrades ever since > > The license seems to be LGPL 2.0 and is explained in greater detail here > > http://mpg123.org/cgi-bin/scm/mpg123/trunk/doc/ROAD_TO_LGPL?revision=2607 > > So what portions of it are having different terms for commercial distribution ? > > Thanks > > -Khem It's because MPEG audio is subject to royalties. This is also the reason why gst-plugins-ugly and gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly have this flag. Carlos