From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from p3plsmtpa11-02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net ([68.178.252.103]:59626 "EHLO p3plsmtpa11-02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752098AbaIPUNH (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:13:07 -0400 Message-ID: <541899D8.4020101@componentsw.com> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:13:12 -0700 From: Walter Mack MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH wpan-next] ieee802154: mrf24j40: support for external rx/tx References: <1410759338-21663-1-git-send-email-wmack@componentsw.com> <20140916070156.GB1244@omega> In-Reply-To: <20140916070156.GB1244@omega> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wpan-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Alexander Aring Cc: linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, alan@signal11.us, simon.vincent@xsilon.com Alex, this is not a question of chip revisions. Chips with the same revision can be used in designs with or without the external transmitter/receiver. Its just that the chip has to be set up to be compatible with the design. On 09/16/2014 12:01 AM, Alexander Aring wrote: > Alan, > > ping? > > This looks for me like what Simon Vincent has send about a month ago. > > I like more to check on chip revision instead setting module parameter, > but you have the last word. > > Please, handle this in any way which you like. I see now there comming > more patches for the same issue, I don't like that. We should add > support for this. > > - Alex >