Re: [v6][PATCH 2/2] xen:vtd: missing RMRR mapping while share EPT

["Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>]

On 2014/9/16 9:24, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
> On 2014/9/13 5:26, Tim Deegan wrote:
>> At 09:59 -0700 on 12 Sep (1410512391), Lars Kurth wrote:
>>> On 12 Sep 2014, at 01:27, Chen, Tiejun <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2014/9/12 15:19, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I still hope we can issue such a vote on these two patches if
>>>>>> possible.
>>> There are several ways we can do this:
>>> * Jan and Tim can ask the other committers for an opinion (either
>>> publicly on the list - ideally related to this thread for
>>> traceability - or privately depending on preference) and one may
>>> change their opinion based on what the others say
>>> * As there is also a potential risk element for the 4.5 release
>>> Jan/Tim could ask the Release Manager for an opinion too and take
>>> that into account
>>> * Jan/Tim can ask the Project Lead (aka Keir) to make a decision : in
>>> other words as peers they both agree to disagree and ask Keir to act
>>> as referee.
>>
>> Actually I don't think we need to go so far.  I'm happy to defer to Jan's
>> judgement on this; we ought to sort out RMRRs properly.
>
> Jan,
>
> What's your last judgement?
>
> Could we apply these two separate patches in advance? I think actually
> they aren't blocking the remains what we tried to do in another RFC
> series, but now we really need them to make sure GFX passthrough can
> work well.
>
> For that RFC I have to take more time to cover all scenarios, so as you
> saw its really a slow process I can push forward.

Any consideration?

Thanks
Tiejun

>
> Thanks
> Tiejun
>
>>
>> My apologies for not following this thread closely enough; I hadn't
>> realised I was causing such a disagreement.  (In my defence I wasn't CC'd
>> until now.)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Tim.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>
>