From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from nasmtp01.atmel.com ([192.199.1.246] helo=DVREDG02.corp.atmel.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XUAgN-0008GE-Q1 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:33:48 +0000 Message-ID: <5419473D.7060007@atmel.com> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:33:01 +0800 From: Josh Wu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: atmel_nand: remove pmecc_sector_number, use ecc.steps instead References: <1407489155-16545-1-git-send-email-josh.wu@atmel.com> In-Reply-To: <1407489155-16545-1-git-send-email-josh.wu@atmel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: computersforpeace@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, Brian Any feedback for this patch series? Best Regards, Josh Wu On 8/8/2014 5:12 PM, Josh Wu wrote: > For PMECC, the pmecc_sector_number has same meaning as ecc.steps. > So use ecc.steps to replace the pmecc_sector_number. > > Signed-off-by: Josh Wu > --- > drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c | 14 ++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c > index 9c5f717..1dc3988 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c > @@ -129,7 +129,6 @@ struct atmel_nand_host { > u32 pmecc_lookup_table_offset_1024; > > int pmecc_bytes_per_sector; > - int pmecc_sector_number; > int pmecc_degree; /* Degree of remainders */ > int pmecc_cw_len; /* Length of codeword */ > > @@ -874,7 +873,7 @@ static int pmecc_correction(struct mtd_info *mtd, u32 pmecc_stat, uint8_t *buf, > return 0; > > normal_check: > - for (i = 0; i < host->pmecc_sector_number; i++) { > + for (i = 0; i < nand_chip->ecc.steps; i++) { > err_nbr = 0; > if (pmecc_stat & 0x1) { > buf_pos = buf + i * host->pmecc_sector_size; > @@ -984,7 +983,7 @@ static int atmel_nand_pmecc_write_page(struct mtd_info *mtd, > cpu_relax(); > } > > - for (i = 0; i < host->pmecc_sector_number; i++) { > + for (i = 0; i < chip->ecc.steps; i++) { > for (j = 0; j < host->pmecc_bytes_per_sector; j++) { > int pos; > > @@ -1031,7 +1030,7 @@ static void atmel_pmecc_core_init(struct mtd_info *mtd) > else if (host->pmecc_sector_size == 1024) > val |= PMECC_CFG_SECTOR1024; > > - switch (host->pmecc_sector_number) { > + switch (nand_chip->ecc.steps) { > case 1: > val |= PMECC_CFG_PAGE_1SECTOR; > break; > @@ -1184,18 +1183,17 @@ static int atmel_pmecc_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev, > host->pmecc_degree = (sector_size == 512) ? > PMECC_GF_DIMENSION_13 : PMECC_GF_DIMENSION_14; > host->pmecc_cw_len = (1 << host->pmecc_degree) - 1; > - host->pmecc_sector_number = mtd->writesize / sector_size; > host->pmecc_bytes_per_sector = pmecc_get_ecc_bytes( > cap, sector_size); > host->pmecc_alpha_to = pmecc_get_alpha_to(host); > host->pmecc_index_of = host->pmecc_rom_base + > host->pmecc_lookup_table_offset; > > - nand_chip->ecc.steps = host->pmecc_sector_number; > nand_chip->ecc.strength = cap; > nand_chip->ecc.bytes = host->pmecc_bytes_per_sector; > - nand_chip->ecc.total = host->pmecc_bytes_per_sector * > - host->pmecc_sector_number; > + nand_chip->ecc.steps = mtd->writesize / sector_size; > + nand_chip->ecc.total = nand_chip->ecc.bytes * > + nand_chip->ecc.steps; > if (nand_chip->ecc.total > mtd->oobsize - 2) { > dev_err(host->dev, "No room for ECC bytes\n"); > err_no = -EINVAL;