From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@rempel-privat.de (Oleksij Rempel) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:46:57 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 4/7] clk: add clk-asm9260 driver In-Reply-To: <20140917135440.GG27054@piout.net> References: <1410646408-28901-1-git-send-email-linux@rempel-privat.de> <1410646408-28901-5-git-send-email-linux@rempel-privat.de> <20140917135440.GG27054@piout.net> Message-ID: <541A7FE1.8060202@rempel-privat.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Am 17.09.2014 um 15:54 schrieb Alexandre Belloni: > Hi, > > Please have a look at https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/14/598 which describe > the preferred way of implementing clocks in the CCF where you only > declare the clock generator in the DT instead of each separate clocks. hm... if i see it correctly. i will need to move almost everything from DT to clk-driver. And i will need to create separate driver for other SoC provided by AlphaScale. On other side with current (generic) driver i will need only to change DT and it will work. May be instead of going qcom way, it will be better to have generic gate, div and mux bindings for DT? Sure it will make DT a bit fuzzy, but it will dramatically reduce kernel code and reduce the time of providing code to upstream. I don't think drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8974.c is less complicated solution. -- Regards, Oleksij -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 213 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: