From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8D770A0B for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 03:01:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8J31PfT023100 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 18 Sep 2014 20:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.141] (128.224.162.141) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.174.1; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 20:01:25 -0700 Message-ID: <541B9C89.3050508@windriver.com> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 11:01:29 +0800 From: Rongqing Li User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Eggleton References: <53F40A50.4030509@windriver.com> <2290847.YcZyNWaetr@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <2290847.YcZyNWaetr@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: Should we set the LICENSE_FLAGS = "commercial" in meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/crda/crda_1.1.3.bb X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 03:01:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 09/17/2014 06:26 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Hi Roy, > > On Wednesday 20 August 2014 10:39:12 Rongqing Li wrote: >> I see the recipes is using the binary file, >> http://wireless.kernel.org/download/wireless-regdb/regulatory.bins/2013.01.1 >> 1-regulatory.bin Should we set the LICENSE_FLAGS = "commercial" in ] >> meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/crda/crda_1.1.3.bb > > It depends on what the terms of distribution are for that binary. I could be > wrong, but it looks to me as if this is a binary version of the wireless-regdb > database [1], which is ISC licensed. If that is the case then LICENSE_FLAGS = > "commercial" wouldn't be needed. > > Cheers, > Paul I see, thanks for your reply. -Roy > > [1] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/Regulatory/wireless-regdb > -- Best Reagrds, Roy | RongQing Li