From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XW7dt-000151-Bn for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:43:17 +0000 Received: from [192.168.100.236] (firewall.candelatech.com [70.89.124.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.candelatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81BE240A032 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 10:42:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54205FA0.5000802@candelatech.com> Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 10:42:56 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Using host's rate-ctrl in ath10k? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: ath10k Has anyone looked into what it would take to use standard host OS's rate control (minstrel_ht) with ath10k? I suspect the ath10k rate control logic in the firmware is a bit dodgy, and it would be nice to use something with wider testing such as minstrel_ht... Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k