From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Gaurav Minocha
<gaurav.minocha.os-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
rob.herring-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation regarding attaching OF Selftest testdata
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:09:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5420C852.5010905@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140908132007.02837C40AE5-WNowdnHR2B42iJbIjFUEsiwD8/FfD2ys@public.gmane.org>
On 9/8/2014 6:20 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 00:16:29 -0700, Gaurav Minocha <gaurav.minocha.os@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This patch add a document that explains how the selftest test data
>> is dynamically attached into the live device tree irrespective
>> of the machine's architecture.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gaurav Minocha <gaurav.minocha.os-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>
> Applied, thanks.
>
> Watch out for trailing whitespace. I had to tidy up many lines.
Is it ok to use UTF-8 characters outside the ascii range in Documentation .txt
files? If not, there are a few below (I'll point out at least a few inline).
The characters are all various forms of a quote or apostrophe.
I do not know what the characters in this reply will look like in anyone else's email
client. In thunderbird, the non-ascii UTF-8 characters in the original patch displayed
properly. In thunderbird, the same text in Grant's reply, prefixed with '> ' to indicate
an email reply the non-ascii UTF-8 is mangled. In thunderbird, if I reply to Grant's
reply, the same mangling occurs.
-Frank
>
> g.
>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/of_selftest.txt | 204 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 204 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/of_selftest.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/of_selftest.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/of_selftest.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..b1d9250
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/of_selftest.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
>> +Open Firmware Device Tree Selftest
>> +-----------------------------------
>> +
>> +Author: Gaurav Minocha <gaurav.minocha.os-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> +
>> +1. Introduction
>> +
>> +This document explains how the test data required for executing OF selftest
>> +is attached to the live tree dynamically, independent of the machine's
>> +architecture.
>> +
>> +It is recommended to read the following documents before moving ahead.
>> +
>> +[1] Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.txt
>> +[2] http://www.devicetree.org/Device_Tree_Usage
>> +
>> +OF Selftest has been designed to test the interface (include/linux/of.h)
>> +provided to device driver developers to fetch the device information..etc.
>> +from the unflattened device tree data structure. This interface is used by
>> +most of the device drivers in various use cases.
>> +
>> +
>> +2. Test-data
>> +
>> +The Device Tree Source file (drivers/of/testcase-data/testcases.dts) contains
>> +the test data required for executing the unit tests automated in
>> +drivers/of/selftests.c. Currently, following Device Tree Source Include files
>> +(.dtsi) are included in testcase.dts:
>> +
>> +drivers/of/testcase-data/tests-interrupts.dtsi
>> +drivers/of/testcase-data/tests-platform.dtsi
>> +drivers/of/testcase-data/tests-phandle.dtsi
>> +drivers/of/testcase-data/tests-match.dtsi
>> +
>> +When the kernel is build with OF_SELFTEST enabled, then the following make rule
>> +
>> +$(obj)/%.dtb: $(src)/%.dts FORCE
>> + $(call if_changed_dep, dtc)
>> +
>> +is used to compile the DT source file (testcase.dts) into a binary blob
>> +(testcase.dtb), also referred as flattened DT.
>> +
>> +After that, using the following rule the binary blob above is wrapped as an
>> +assembly file (testcase.dtb.S).
>> +
>> +$(obj)/%.dtb.S: $(obj)/%.dtb
>> + $(call cmd, dt_S_dtb)
>> +
>> +The assembly file is compiled into an object file (testcase.dtb.o), and is
>> +linked into the kernel image.
>> +
>> +
>> +2.1. Adding the test data
>> +
>> +Un-flattened device tree structure:
>> +
>> +Un-flattened device tree consists of connected device_node(s) in form of a tree
>> +structure described below.
>> +
>> +// following struct members are used to construct the tree
>> +struct device_node {
>> + ...
>> + struct device_node *parent;
>> + struct device_node *child;
>> + struct device_node *sibling;
>> + struct device_node *allnext; /* next in list of all nodes */
>> + ...
>> + };
>> +
>> +Figure 1, describes a generic structure of machine’s un-flattened device tree
>> +considering only child and sibling pointers. There exists another pointer,
>> +*parent, that is used to traverse the tree in the reverse direction. So, at
>> +a particular level the child node and all the sibling nodes will have a parent
>> +pointer pointing to a common node (e.g. child1, sibling2, sibling3, sibling4’s
^^^
non-ascii UTF-8
>> +parent points to root node)
>> +
>> +root (‘/’)
^^^ ^^^
non-ascii UTF-8
>> + |
>> +child1 -> sibling2 -> sibling3 -> sibling4 -> null
>> + | | | |
>> + | | | null
>> + | | child31 -> sibling32 -> null
>> + | | | |
>> + | | null null
>> + | child21 -> sibling22 -> sibling23 -> null
>> + | | | |
>> + | null null null
>> +child11 -> sibling12 -> sibling13 -> sibling14 -> null
>> + | | | |
>> + | | | null
>> + null null child131 -> null
>> + |
>> + null
>> +
>> +Figure 1: Generic structure of un-flattened device tree
>> +
>> +
>> +*allnext: it is used to link all the nodes of DT into a list. So, for the
>> + above tree the list would be as follows:
>> +
>> +root->child1->child11->sibling12->sibling13->child131->sibling14->sibling2->
>> +child21->sibling22->sibling23->sibling3->child31->sibling32->sibling4->null
>> +
>> +Before executing OF selftest, it is required to attach the test data to
>> +machine's device tree (if present). So, when selftest_data_add() is called,
>> +at first it reads the flattened device tree data linked into the kernel image
>> +via the following kernel symbols:
>> +
>> +__dtb_testcases_begin - address marking the start of test data blob
>> +__dtb_testcases_end - address marking the end of test data blob
>> +
>> +Secondly, it calls of_fdt_unflatten_device_tree() to unflatten the flattened
>> +blob. And finally, if the machine’s device tree (i.e live tree) is present,
>> +then it attaches the unflattened test data tree to the live tree, else it
>> +attaches itself as a live device tree.
>> +
>> +attach_node_and_children() uses of_attach_node() to attach the nodes into the
>> +live tree as explained below. To explain the same, the test data tree described
>> + in Figure 2 is attached to the live tree described in Figure 1.
>> +
>> +root (‘/’)
^^^ ^^^
non-ascii UTF-8
>> + |
>> + testcase-data
>> + |
>> + test-child0 -> test-sibling1 -> test-sibling2 -> test-sibling3 -> null
>> + | | | |
>> + test-child01 null null null
>> +
>> +
>> +allnext list:
>> +
>> +root->testcase-data->test-child0->test-child01->test-sibling1->test-sibling2
>> +->test-sibling3->null
>> +
>> +Figure 2: Example test data tree to be attached to live tree.
>> +
>> +According to the scenario above, the live tree is already present so it isn’t
>> +required to attach the root(‘/’) node. All other nodes are attached by calling
>> +of_attach_node() on each node.
>> +
>> +In the function of_attach_node(), the new node is attached as the child of the
>> +given parent in live tree. But, if parent already has a child then the new node
>> +replaces the current child and turns it into its sibling. So, when the testcase
>> +data node is attached to the live tree above (Figure 1), the final structure is
>> + as shown in Figure 3.
>> +
>> +root (‘/’)
^^^ ^^^
non-ascii UTF-8
>> + |
>> +testcase-data -> child1 -> sibling2 -> sibling3 -> sibling4 -> null
>> + | | | | |
>> + (...) | | | null
>> + | | child31 -> sibling32 -> null
>> + | | | |
>> + | | null null
>> + | child21 -> sibling22 -> sibling23 -> null
>> + | | | |
>> + | null null null
>> + child11 -> sibling12 -> sibling13 -> sibling14 -> null
>> + | | | |
>> + null null | null
>> + child131 -> null
>> + |
>> + null
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> +
>> +root (‘/’)
^^^ ^^^
non-ascii UTF-8
>> + |
>> +testcase-data -> child1 -> sibling2 -> sibling3 -> sibling4 -> null
>> + | | | | |
>> + | (...) (...) (...) null
>> + |
>> +test-sibling3 -> test-sibling2 -> test-sibling1 -> test-child0 -> null
>> + | | | |
>> + null null null test-child01
>> +
>> +
>> +Figure 3: Live device tree structure after attaching the testcase-data.
>> +
>> +
>> +Astute readers would have noticed that test-child0 node becomes the last
>> +sibling compared to the earlier structure (Figure 2). After attaching first
>> +test-child0 the test-sibling1 is attached that pushes the child node
>> +(i.e. test-child0) to become a sibling and makes itself a child node,
>> + as mentioned above.
>> +
>> +If a duplicate node is found (i.e. if a node with same full_name property is
>> +already present in the live tree), then the node isn’t attached rather its
^^^
non-ascii UTF-8
>> +properties are updated to the live tree’s node by calling the function
^^^
non-ascii UTF-8
>> +update_node_properties().
>> +
>> +
>> +2.2. Removing the test data
>> +
>> +Once the test case execution is complete, selftest_data_remove is called in
>> +order to remove the device nodes attached initially (first the leaf nodes are
>> +detached and then moving up the parent nodes are removed, and eventually the
>> +whole tree). selftest_data_remove() calls detach_node_and_children() that uses
>> +of_detach_node() to detach the nodes from the live device tree.
>> +
>> +To detach a node, of_detach_node() first updates all_next linked list, by
>> +attaching the previous node’s allnext to current node’s allnext pointer. And
^^^ ^^^
non-ascii UTF-8 non-ascii UTF-8
>> +then, it either updates the child pointer of given node’s parent to its
^^^
non-ascii UTF-8
>> +sibling or attaches the previous sibling to the given node’s sibling, as
^^^
non-ascii UTF-8
>> +appropriate. That is it :)
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-23 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-03 7:16 [PATCH] Documentation regarding attaching OF Selftest testdata Gaurav Minocha
[not found] ` <1409728589-9019-1-git-send-email-gaurav.minocha.os-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-08 13:20 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <20140908132007.02837C40AE5-WNowdnHR2B42iJbIjFUEsiwD8/FfD2ys@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-23 1:09 ` Frank Rowand [this message]
[not found] ` <5420C852.5010905-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-24 14:41 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <20140924144135.78D69C40738-WNowdnHR2B42iJbIjFUEsiwD8/FfD2ys@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-24 18:01 ` Gaurav Minocha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5420C852.5010905@gmail.com \
--to=frowand.list-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=gaurav.minocha.os-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rob.herring-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.