From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:61440 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754454AbaIWH6M (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2014 03:58:12 -0400 Message-ID: <5421280E.2060203@xsilon.com> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:58:06 +0100 From: Simon Vincent MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH wpan-next] ieee802154: mrf24j40: support for external rx/tx References: <1410759338-21663-1-git-send-email-wmack@componentsw.com> <20140916070156.GB1244@omega> <541899D8.4020101@componentsw.com> <20140916202000.GF6104@omega> <5420EE4F.5000007@signal11.us> <20140923071932.GA11396@omega> In-Reply-To: <20140923071932.GA11396@omega> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wpan-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Alexander Aring , Alan Ott Cc: Walter Mack , linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org I was under the impression the patch had been signed off. Maybe I missed a mail... I can confirm the mrf24j40 works just fine using a DT. Simon On 23/09/14 08:19, Alexander Aring wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:51:43PM -0400, Alan Ott wrote: >> On 09/16/2014 04:20 PM, Alexander Aring wrote: >>> Hi Walter, >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 01:13:12PM -0700, Walter Mack wrote: >>>> Alex, >>>> >>>> this is not a question of chip revisions. Chips with the same revision can >>>> be used in designs with or without the external transmitter/receiver. Its >>>> just that the chip has to be set up to be compatible with the design. >>>> >>> ah, ok. Dunno, I will wait on alan's opinion. If I don't heard anything in one >>> week I will apply it. >> Did Simon's patch get applied? I couldn't see it in any of the obvious >> places when I looked the other day. >> > no, I finally wait for your Acked-by: .... otherwise I will not apply. > That's indicate for me that this patch is okay for you and came into > mainline. There are also pending patches from Varka, if you don't reply > on it, I will not apply it. Should I always simple apply the patches > if you don't response? It's better for me that I see a "Acked-by" from you. > > Simon's patch state: > You had some reviewing notes at Simon's patch. I think Simon doesn't > response to this yet. I didn't see any new versions of this. > > > > For DT example you can take a look into at86rf230 driver or cc2520. I > mean examples to add some DT properties. Also if you want to make this > driver dt enabled then you need a documentation in: > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ieee802154/$DRIVERNAME.txt > > > - Alex