All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: imammedo@redhat.com, peter.huangpeng@huawei.com,
	luonengjun@huawei.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	hutao@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vl: Adjust the place of calling mlockall to speedup VM's startup
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 18:19:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54214941.1070004@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140923083026.GD16527@redhat.com>

On 2014/9/23 16:30, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 03:57:47PM +0800, zhanghailiang wrote:
>> If we configure mlock=on and memory policy=bind at the same time,
>> It will consume lots of time for system to treat with memory,
>> especially when call mbind after mlockall.
>>
>> Adjust the place of calling mlockall, calling mbind before mlockall
>> can remarkably reduce the time of VM's startup.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>
>
> The idea makes absolute sense to me:
> bind after lock will force data copy of
> all pages. bind before lock gives us an
> indication where to put data on fault in.
>
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>
>

Thanks for your quick reviewing..

Best Regards,
zhanghailiang

>> ---
>> Hi,
>>
>> Actually, for mbind and mlockall, i have made a test about the time consuming
>> for the different call sequence.
>>
>> The results is shown below. It is obviously that mlockall called before mbind is
>> more time-consuming.
>>
>> Besides, this patch is OK with memory hotplug.
>>
>> TEST CODE:
>>      if (mbind_first) {
>>          printf("mbind --> mlockall\n");
>>          mbind(ptr, ram_size/2, MPOL_BIND, &node0mask, 2,
>>                MPOL_MF_STRICT | MPOL_MF_MOVE);
>>          mbind(ptr + ram_size/2, ram_size/2, MPOL_BIND, &node1mask, 2,
>>                MPOL_MF_STRICT | MPOL_MF_MOVE);
>>          mlockall(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE);
>>      } else {
>>          printf("mlockall --> mbind\n");
>>          mlockall(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE);
>>          mbind(ptr, ram_size/2, MPOL_BIND, &node0mask, 2 ,
>>                MPOL_MF_STRICT | MPOL_MF_MOVE);
>>          mbind(ptr + ram_size/2, ram_size/2, MPOL_BIND, &node1mask, 2,
>>                MPOL_MF_STRICT | MPOL_MF_MOVE);
>>      }
>>
>> RESULT 1:
>> #time /home/test_mbind 10240 0
>> memroy size 10737418240
>> mlockall --> mbind
>>
>> real    0m11.886s
>> user    0m0.004s
>> sys     0m11.865s
>> #time /home/test_mbind 10240 1
>> memroy size 10737418240
>> mbind --> mlockall
>>
>> real    0m5.334s
>> user    0m0.000s
>> sys     0m5.324s
>>
>> RESULT 2:
>> #time /home/test_mbind 4096 0
>> memroy size 4294967296
>> mlockall --> mbind
>>
>> real    0m5.503s
>> user    0m0.000s
>> sys     0m5.492s
>> #time /home/test_mbind 4096 1
>> memroy size 4294967296
>> mbind --> mlockall
>>
>> real    0m2.139s
>> user    0m0.000s
>> sys     0m2.132s
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> zhanghailiang
>> ---
>>   vl.c | 11 +++++------
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c
>> index dc792fe..adf4770 100644
>> --- a/vl.c
>> +++ b/vl.c
>> @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ const char* keyboard_layout = NULL;
>>   ram_addr_t ram_size;
>>   const char *mem_path = NULL;
>>   int mem_prealloc = 0; /* force preallocation of physical target memory */
>> +int enable_mlock = false;
>>   int nb_nics;
>>   NICInfo nd_table[MAX_NICS];
>>   int autostart;
>> @@ -1421,12 +1422,8 @@ static void smp_parse(QemuOpts *opts)
>>
>>   }
>>
>> -static void configure_realtime(QemuOpts *opts)
>> +static void realtime_init(void)
>>   {
>> -    bool enable_mlock;
>> -
>> -    enable_mlock = qemu_opt_get_bool(opts, "mlock", true);
>> -
>>       if (enable_mlock) {
>>           if (os_mlock() < 0) {
>>               fprintf(stderr, "qemu: locking memory failed\n");
>> @@ -3973,7 +3970,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
>>                   if (!opts) {
>>                       exit(1);
>>                   }
>> -                configure_realtime(opts);
>> +                enable_mlock = qemu_opt_get_bool(opts, "mlock", true);
>>                   break;
>>               case QEMU_OPTION_msg:
>>                   opts = qemu_opts_parse(qemu_find_opts("msg"), optarg, 0);
>> @@ -4441,6 +4438,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
>>
>>       machine_class->init(current_machine);
>>
>> +    realtime_init();
>> +
>>       audio_init();
>>
>>       cpu_synchronize_all_post_init();
>> --
>> 1.7.12.4
>>
>
> .
>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-09-23 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-23  7:57 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vl: Adjust the place of calling mlockall to speedup VM's startup zhanghailiang
2014-09-23  8:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-09-23  8:35   ` Hu Tao
2014-09-23  9:06     ` zhanghailiang
2014-09-23 10:19   ` zhanghailiang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54214941.1070004@huawei.com \
    --to=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=hutao@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=luonengjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.huangpeng@huawei.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.