From: Andy Grover <agrover@redhat.com>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/8] target: Save memory on unused se_dev_entrys and se_luns
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 10:02:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5421A79F.9010003@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411082258.28382.17.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com>
On 09/18/2014 04:17 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> I'm currently reviewing #2, #4, #5 and #7 and will consider merging
> these. These cleanups account for most of the LOC reduction, and avoid
> most of the larger concerns.
>
> Also for patches like this, they really need testing on your end before
> I'll consider them merging. Compile testing alone for these types of
> locking changes is not enough, given the history of regressions with
> these types of cleanups.
OK. I'll look for those to show up in your tree, then? And work on
better dividing up of the remaining changes, and also minimize their
risk of causing regressions.
Regards -- Andy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-23 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-30 23:39 [PATCHv3 0/8] target: Save memory on unused se_dev_entrys and se_luns Andy Grover
2014-06-30 23:39 ` [PATCHv3 1/8] target: Add locking to some accesses to nacl.device_list Andy Grover
2014-07-01 8:48 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2014-07-01 16:15 ` [PATCHv3 9/8] target: Fix return with spinlock held in scsi3_ua_check() Andy Grover
2014-06-30 23:39 ` [PATCHv3 2/8] target: Don't unlock/relock tpg_lun_lock in loop in add_node_to_devs Andy Grover
2014-06-30 23:39 ` [PATCHv3 3/8] target: Allocate se_dev_entrys in device list only when used Andy Grover
2014-06-30 23:39 ` [PATCHv3 4/8] target: core_tpg_post_dellun can return void Andy Grover
2014-06-30 23:39 ` [PATCHv3 5/8] target: Change core_dev_del_lun to take a se_lun instead of unpacked_lun Andy Grover
2014-06-30 23:39 ` [PATCHv3 6/8] target: Allocate se_luns only when used Andy Grover
2014-06-30 23:39 ` [PATCHv3 7/8] target: Remove core_tpg_release_virtual_lun0 function Andy Grover
2014-06-30 23:39 ` [PATCHv3 8/8] target: Refactor core_enable_device_list_for_node Andy Grover
2014-07-29 13:15 ` [PATCHv3 0/8] target: Save memory on unused se_dev_entrys and se_luns Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-22 22:13 ` Andy Grover
2014-09-13 19:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-18 7:38 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2014-09-18 22:54 ` Andy Grover
2014-09-18 23:17 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2014-09-23 17:02 ` Andy Grover [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5421A79F.9010003@redhat.com \
--to=agrover@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.