All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, stephen@networkplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vlan: Fix receive statistics under-reporting
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:45:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5422F539.5060408@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411571333.15395.33.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>

On 09/24/2014 11:08 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 10:45 -0400, Vladislav Yasevich wrote:
>> Vlan devices uder-report 14 bytes per packet in the recieve statistics.
>> This is because the ETH_HLEN bytes of data has been pulled off the skb
>> by the time it gets to the vlan receive code.  When accounting for
>> receive butes, add ETH_HLEN back.
>>
>> See also https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84951
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  net/8021q/vlan_core.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/8021q/vlan_core.c b/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
>> index 90cc2bd..8bc5d46 100644
>> --- a/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
>> +++ b/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
>> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ bool vlan_do_receive(struct sk_buff **skbp)
>>  
>>  	u64_stats_update_begin(&rx_stats->syncp);
>>  	rx_stats->rx_packets++;
>> -	rx_stats->rx_bytes += skb->len;
>> +	rx_stats->rx_bytes += skb->len + ETH_HLEN;
>>  	if (skb->pkt_type == PACKET_MULTICAST)
>>  		rx_stats->rx_multicast++;
>>  	u64_stats_update_end(&rx_stats->syncp);
> 
> 
> I do not think this patch is general enough, it doesn't handle GRO for
> example.

I just looked at more software devices (including encapsulators) and
find that macvlan appears to be the only anomaly.

Everyone appears to be using skb->len directly and dropping ETH_HLEN.
Macvlan tries to be "extra smart" and adds the ETH_HLEN back in.

Definitely this patch isn't enough all by itself.  I might be better
to make it consistent the other way around.


> 
> And should not the vlan tag also be accounted ? 
> 
> 

I don't think so. We don't do it on TX.

-vlad

      reply	other threads:[~2014-09-24 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-22 16:01 Fw: [Bug 84951] New: 8021q: kernel doesn't take into account ethernet header bytes for received packets Stephen Hemminger
2014-09-24 14:36 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-09-24 14:45 ` [PATCH] vlan: Fix receive statistics under-reporting Vladislav Yasevich
2014-09-24 15:08   ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-24 16:45     ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5422F539.5060408@redhat.com \
    --to=vyasevic@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.