From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamal Hadi Salim Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 1/1 V4] qdisc: bulk dequeue support for qdiscs with TCQ_F_ONETXQUEUE Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:48:52 -0400 Message-ID: <54240F34.1050707@mojatatu.com> References: <20140924160932.9721.56450.stgit@localhost> <20140924161047.9721.43080.stgit@localhost> <1411579395.15395.41.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <20140924195831.6fb91051@redhat.com> <54234225.5000503@mojatatu.com> <20140925102505.494acab1@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eric Dumazet , netdev@vger.kernel.org, therbert@google.com, "David S. Miller" , Alexander Duyck , toke@toke.dk, Florian Westphal , Dave Taht , John Fastabend , Daniel Borkmann , Hannes Frederic Sowa To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com ([209.85.213.179]:50421 "EHLO mail-ig0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751423AbaIYMtA (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:49:00 -0400 Received: by mail-ig0-f179.google.com with SMTP id l13so8313790iga.6 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 05:48:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140925102505.494acab1@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/25/14 04:25, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:13:57 -0400 > I've done measurements with netperf-wrapper: > http://netoptimizer.blogspot.dk/2014/09/mini-tutorial-for-netperf-wrapper-setup.html > > I have already previously posted my measurements here: > http://people.netfilter.org/hawk/qdisc/ > http://people.netfilter.org/hawk/qdisc/measure01/ > http://people.netfilter.org/hawk/qdisc/experiment01/ > Theres a lot of data there to digest; all good looking. I will try to pay attention to detail and get back to you. What you have on those urls is fit for a paper, but what someone like me (with ADD) needs is a summary somewhere maybe in the commit logs. > Please, see my previous mail where I described each graph. > Is this patch 0? I think a simple statement in the commit log that no cats were harmed ^W^W^W performance was affected. A paragraph at most but if you want to do more, DaveM actually has no problems if you write the details of a novel in patch 0. cheers, jamal