On 09/25/2014 10:12 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:

>>> Do we want to permit anything but a complex type for 'returns'?
>>
>> Sadly, yes.  We have existing commands that do just that.  I already
>> documented that new commands should avoid it (it's not extensible).
> 
> If we care, we can whitelist the existing offenders, and reject new
> offenders.

Also a good idea.  The whitelist may grow over time, but forcing a
developer to modify the whitelist calls attention to their action :)

I'll add that to my v5 queue.  Thanks again for a thought-provoking review.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org