From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yijing Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/22] MSI: Remove the redundant irq_set_chip_data() Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:04:45 +0800 Message-ID: <5424C9BD.3040506@huawei.com> References: <1411614872-4009-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <1411614872-4009-4-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <20140925071919.GH12423@ulmo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140925071919.GH12423@ulmo> Sender: linux-ia64-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Thierry Reding Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xinwei Hu , Wuyun , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, arnab.basu@freescale.com, Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com, x86@kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Thomas Gleixner , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Joerg Roedel , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Ott , Tony Luck , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , sparclinux@vger.ke List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On 2014/9/25 15:19, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:14:13AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote: >> Currently, pcie-designware, pcie-rcar, pci-tegra drivers >> use irq chip_data to save the msi_chip pointer. They >> already call irq_set_chip_data() in their own MSI irq map >> functions. So irq_set_chip_data() in arch_setup_msi_irq() >> is useless. > > Again, I think this should be the other way around. If drivers do > something that's already handled by the core, then the duplicate code > should be dropped from the drivers. Hi Thierry, this is different thing, because chip_data is specific to IRQ controller, and in other platform, like in x86, chip_data is used to save irq_cfg. So we can not call irq_set_chip_data() in core code. x86 irq piece code int arch_setup_hwirq(unsigned int irq, int node) { struct irq_cfg *cfg; unsigned long flags; int ret; cfg = alloc_irq_cfg(irq, node); if (!cfg) return -ENOMEM; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags); ret = __assign_irq_vector(irq, cfg, apic->target_cpus()); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags); if (!ret) irq_set_chip_data(irq, cfg); ------------->Save irq_cfg else free_irq_cfg(irq, cfg); return ret; } Thanks! Yijing. > > Thierry > -- Thanks! Yijing From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from [119.145.14.64] ([119.145.14.64]:41736 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752792AbaIZCFm (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 22:05:42 -0400 Message-ID: <5424C9BD.3040506@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:04:45 +0800 From: Yijing Wang MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/22] MSI: Remove the redundant irq_set_chip_data() References: <1411614872-4009-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <1411614872-4009-4-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <20140925071919.GH12423@ulmo> In-Reply-To: <20140925071919.GH12423@ulmo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Thierry Reding Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xinwei Hu , Wuyun , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, arnab.basu@freescale.com, Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com, x86@kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Thomas Gleixner , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Joerg Roedel , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Ott , Tony Luck , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Chris Metcalf , Ralf Baechle , Lucas Stach , David Vrabel , Sergei Shtylyov , Michael Ellerman , Thomas Petazzoni Message-ID: <20140926020445.d3nOkW_AvP3ZsHe8nCANHCM7zIq6NUsctFrmNeiS16k@z> On 2014/9/25 15:19, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:14:13AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote: >> Currently, pcie-designware, pcie-rcar, pci-tegra drivers >> use irq chip_data to save the msi_chip pointer. They >> already call irq_set_chip_data() in their own MSI irq map >> functions. So irq_set_chip_data() in arch_setup_msi_irq() >> is useless. > > Again, I think this should be the other way around. If drivers do > something that's already handled by the core, then the duplicate code > should be dropped from the drivers. Hi Thierry, this is different thing, because chip_data is specific to IRQ controller, and in other platform, like in x86, chip_data is used to save irq_cfg. So we can not call irq_set_chip_data() in core code. x86 irq piece code int arch_setup_hwirq(unsigned int irq, int node) { struct irq_cfg *cfg; unsigned long flags; int ret; cfg = alloc_irq_cfg(irq, node); if (!cfg) return -ENOMEM; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags); ret = __assign_irq_vector(irq, cfg, apic->target_cpus()); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags); if (!ret) irq_set_chip_data(irq, cfg); ------------->Save irq_cfg else free_irq_cfg(irq, cfg); return ret; } Thanks! Yijing. > > Thierry > -- Thanks! Yijing From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yijing Wang Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 02:04:45 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/22] MSI: Remove the redundant irq_set_chip_data() Message-Id: <5424C9BD.3040506@huawei.com> List-Id: References: <1411614872-4009-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <1411614872-4009-4-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <20140925071919.GH12423@ulmo> In-Reply-To: <20140925071919.GH12423@ulmo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Thierry Reding Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xinwei Hu , Wuyun , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, arnab.basu@freescale.com, Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com, x86@kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Thomas Gleixner , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Joerg Roedel , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Ott , Tony Luck , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Chris Metcalf , Ralf Baechle , Lucas Stach , David Vrabel , Sergei Shtylyov , Michael Ellerman , Thomas Petazzoni On 2014/9/25 15:19, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:14:13AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote: >> Currently, pcie-designware, pcie-rcar, pci-tegra drivers >> use irq chip_data to save the msi_chip pointer. They >> already call irq_set_chip_data() in their own MSI irq map >> functions. So irq_set_chip_data() in arch_setup_msi_irq() >> is useless. > > Again, I think this should be the other way around. If drivers do > something that's already handled by the core, then the duplicate code > should be dropped from the drivers. Hi Thierry, this is different thing, because chip_data is specific to IRQ controller, and in other platform, like in x86, chip_data is used to save irq_cfg. So we can not call irq_set_chip_data() in core code. x86 irq piece code int arch_setup_hwirq(unsigned int irq, int node) { struct irq_cfg *cfg; unsigned long flags; int ret; cfg = alloc_irq_cfg(irq, node); if (!cfg) return -ENOMEM; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags); ret = __assign_irq_vector(irq, cfg, apic->target_cpus()); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags); if (!ret) irq_set_chip_data(irq, cfg); ------------->Save irq_cfg else free_irq_cfg(irq, cfg); return ret; } Thanks! Yijing. > > Thierry > -- Thanks! Yijing From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 26 Sep 2014 04:06:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.64]:44104 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27009897AbaIZCGUPO0RD (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Sep 2014 04:06:20 +0200 Received: from 172.24.2.119 (EHLO szxeml422-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CCE09686; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:05:04 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.177.27.212) by szxeml422-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.161) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:04:53 +0800 Message-ID: <5424C9BD.3040506@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:04:45 +0800 From: Yijing Wang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thierry Reding CC: Bjorn Helgaas , , , Xinwei Hu , Wuyun , , Russell King , , , , , Arnd Bergmann , Thomas Gleixner , "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" , , Joerg Roedel , , , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , , , Sebastian Ott , "Tony Luck" , , "David S. Miller" , , Chris Metcalf , Ralf Baechle , Lucas Stach , David Vrabel , "Sergei Shtylyov" , Michael Ellerman , Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/22] MSI: Remove the redundant irq_set_chip_data() References: <1411614872-4009-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <1411614872-4009-4-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <20140925071919.GH12423@ulmo> In-Reply-To: <20140925071919.GH12423@ulmo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.27.212] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 42821 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: wangyijing@huawei.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On 2014/9/25 15:19, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:14:13AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote: >> Currently, pcie-designware, pcie-rcar, pci-tegra drivers >> use irq chip_data to save the msi_chip pointer. They >> already call irq_set_chip_data() in their own MSI irq map >> functions. So irq_set_chip_data() in arch_setup_msi_irq() >> is useless. > > Again, I think this should be the other way around. If drivers do > something that's already handled by the core, then the duplicate code > should be dropped from the drivers. Hi Thierry, this is different thing, because chip_data is specific to IRQ controller, and in other platform, like in x86, chip_data is used to save irq_cfg. So we can not call irq_set_chip_data() in core code. x86 irq piece code int arch_setup_hwirq(unsigned int irq, int node) { struct irq_cfg *cfg; unsigned long flags; int ret; cfg = alloc_irq_cfg(irq, node); if (!cfg) return -ENOMEM; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags); ret = __assign_irq_vector(irq, cfg, apic->target_cpus()); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags); if (!ret) irq_set_chip_data(irq, cfg); ------------->Save irq_cfg else free_irq_cfg(irq, cfg); return ret; } Thanks! Yijing. > > Thierry > -- Thanks! Yijing From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D0F51A009F for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:06:24 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <5424C9BD.3040506@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:04:45 +0800 From: Yijing Wang MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thierry Reding Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/22] MSI: Remove the redundant irq_set_chip_data() References: <1411614872-4009-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <1411614872-4009-4-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <20140925071919.GH12423@ulmo> In-Reply-To: <20140925071919.GH12423@ulmo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , Joerg Roedel , x86@kernel.org, Sebastian Ott , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, arnab.basu@freescale.com, Arnd Bergmann , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Chris Metcalf , Bjorn Helgaas , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Petazzoni , Xinwei Hu , Tony Luck , Sergei Shtylyov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, David Vrabel , Wuyun , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" , Lucas Stach List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 2014/9/25 15:19, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:14:13AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote: >> Currently, pcie-designware, pcie-rcar, pci-tegra drivers >> use irq chip_data to save the msi_chip pointer. They >> already call irq_set_chip_data() in their own MSI irq map >> functions. So irq_set_chip_data() in arch_setup_msi_irq() >> is useless. > > Again, I think this should be the other way around. If drivers do > something that's already handled by the core, then the duplicate code > should be dropped from the drivers. Hi Thierry, this is different thing, because chip_data is specific to IRQ controller, and in other platform, like in x86, chip_data is used to save irq_cfg. So we can not call irq_set_chip_data() in core code. x86 irq piece code int arch_setup_hwirq(unsigned int irq, int node) { struct irq_cfg *cfg; unsigned long flags; int ret; cfg = alloc_irq_cfg(irq, node); if (!cfg) return -ENOMEM; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags); ret = __assign_irq_vector(irq, cfg, apic->target_cpus()); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags); if (!ret) irq_set_chip_data(irq, cfg); ------------->Save irq_cfg else free_irq_cfg(irq, cfg); return ret; } Thanks! Yijing. > > Thierry > -- Thanks! Yijing From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yijing Wang Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 02:04:45 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/22] MSI: Remove the redundant irq_set_chip_data() Message-Id: <5424C9BD.3040506@huawei.com> List-Id: References: <1411614872-4009-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <1411614872-4009-4-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <20140925071919.GH12423@ulmo> In-Reply-To: <20140925071919.GH12423@ulmo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Thierry Reding Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xinwei Hu , Wuyun , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, arnab.basu@freescale.com, Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com, x86@kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Thomas Gleixner , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Joerg Roedel , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Ott , Tony Luck , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , sparclinux@vger.ke On 2014/9/25 15:19, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:14:13AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote: >> Currently, pcie-designware, pcie-rcar, pci-tegra drivers >> use irq chip_data to save the msi_chip pointer. They >> already call irq_set_chip_data() in their own MSI irq map >> functions. So irq_set_chip_data() in arch_setup_msi_irq() >> is useless. > > Again, I think this should be the other way around. If drivers do > something that's already handled by the core, then the duplicate code > should be dropped from the drivers. Hi Thierry, this is different thing, because chip_data is specific to IRQ controller, and in other platform, like in x86, chip_data is used to save irq_cfg. So we can not call irq_set_chip_data() in core code. x86 irq piece code int arch_setup_hwirq(unsigned int irq, int node) { struct irq_cfg *cfg; unsigned long flags; int ret; cfg = alloc_irq_cfg(irq, node); if (!cfg) return -ENOMEM; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags); ret = __assign_irq_vector(irq, cfg, apic->target_cpus()); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags); if (!ret) irq_set_chip_data(irq, cfg); ------------->Save irq_cfg else free_irq_cfg(irq, cfg); return ret; } Thanks! Yijing. > > Thierry > -- Thanks! Yijing From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wangyijing@huawei.com (Yijing Wang) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:04:45 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v2 03/22] MSI: Remove the redundant irq_set_chip_data() In-Reply-To: <20140925071919.GH12423@ulmo> References: <1411614872-4009-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <1411614872-4009-4-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <20140925071919.GH12423@ulmo> Message-ID: <5424C9BD.3040506@huawei.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 2014/9/25 15:19, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:14:13AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote: >> Currently, pcie-designware, pcie-rcar, pci-tegra drivers >> use irq chip_data to save the msi_chip pointer. They >> already call irq_set_chip_data() in their own MSI irq map >> functions. So irq_set_chip_data() in arch_setup_msi_irq() >> is useless. > > Again, I think this should be the other way around. If drivers do > something that's already handled by the core, then the duplicate code > should be dropped from the drivers. Hi Thierry, this is different thing, because chip_data is specific to IRQ controller, and in other platform, like in x86, chip_data is used to save irq_cfg. So we can not call irq_set_chip_data() in core code. x86 irq piece code int arch_setup_hwirq(unsigned int irq, int node) { struct irq_cfg *cfg; unsigned long flags; int ret; cfg = alloc_irq_cfg(irq, node); if (!cfg) return -ENOMEM; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags); ret = __assign_irq_vector(irq, cfg, apic->target_cpus()); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags); if (!ret) irq_set_chip_data(irq, cfg); ------------->Save irq_cfg else free_irq_cfg(irq, cfg); return ret; } Thanks! Yijing. > > Thierry > -- Thanks! Yijing