Re: Integration of custom recipe with SDK

[Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On 9/24/14 5:01 AM, Navani Srivastava wrote:
> Removing integration of meta-toolchain-qte from my image helped in building
> qjson as a part of SDK when running bitbake -c populate_sdk -v <myimage> or
> bitbake <myimage>.
> 

OK. Thats what is expected.

> Integration of meta-toolchain-qte might need some more modifications.
> 
> Still as a requirement, I need to integrate my custom recipe with
> meta-toolchain-qte to generate SDK having custom recipe as a tool.

when populate_sdk gives you an SDK I dont understand why this is a
requirement

 I have
> created nativesdk bb file for custom recipe to integrate it via
> nativesdk-packagegroup-qte-toolchain-host.bb but no luck..
> 
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Navani Srivastava <
> navani.srivastava@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Yes.. i did...
>> On 24 Sep 2014 12:56, "Paul Eggleton" <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday 24 September 2014 10:26:41 Navani Srivastava wrote:
>>>> I corrected FILES_${PN} and added following in my image recipe-
>>>> QTNAME = "qte"
>>>> QT_DIR_NAME = "qtopia"
>>>> require recipes-qt/meta/meta-toolchain-qt.bb
>>>>
>>>> but that didn't make any difference related to SDK integration. On
>>>> executing 'bitbake -v <MyImageName>', it is generating rootfs and sdk,
>>> in
>>>> which contains rootfs contains qjson libraries but sdk doesn't integrate
>>>> anything.
>>>
>>> To generate the SDK you'd need to also do bitbake -c populate_sdk
>>> <imagename>
>>> - you did do that as well after making the changes to the recipe, right ?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Paul
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Paul Eggleton
>>> Intel Open Source Technology Centre
>>>
>>
> 

- -- 
- -Khem
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iEYEARECAAYFAlQk3CoACgkQuwUzVZGdMxS3EgCfVUdFehr4kmLrXfLy6jN25Q0e
YSAAn3Dhe/y2xVpFYtpTtDMGCA7qOQR5
=FZTr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----