From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Nelson Subject: Re: Weekly performance meeting Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:57:26 -0500 Message-ID: <54258CE6.1060402@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ie0-f176.google.com ([209.85.223.176]:40969 "EHLO mail-ie0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755270AbaIZP5a (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:57:30 -0400 Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id ar1so16034169iec.21 for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:57:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sage Weil , Milosz Tanski Cc: Dong Yuan , Haomai Wang , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" , Somnath Roy , Allen Samuels , Kasper Dieter , PVonStamwitz@us.fujitsu.com, "Shu, Xinxin" , Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG , xiaoxi.chen@intel.com, "Wang, Zhiqiang" , jianpeng.ma@intel.com, gdror@mellanox.com, vuhuong@mellanox.com, Mark Nelson On 09/26/2014 10:37 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > On Fri, 26 Sep 2014, Milosz Tanski wrote: >>>>> One challenge is timezones: there are developers in the US, China, Europe, >>>>> and Israel who may want to join. As a starting point, how about next >>>>> Wednesday, 15:00 UTC? If I didn't do my tz math wrong, that's >>>>> >>>>> 8:00 (PDT, California) >>>>> 15:00 (UTC) >>>>> 18:00 (IDT, Israel) >>>>> 23:00 (CST, China) >> >> I'd love to participate and contributed to the discussion and solution >> but due to my obligations it's hard to commit to a weekly time so it's >> my hope that a lot of this is done on the mailing list. > > I agree. One thing that has quickly become clear is that there are a > *lot* of areas to address and we can't possibly discuss them all in any > detail in a single meeting. I think the key will be to break things down > into specific areas of investigation that can be discussed in detail > on-list, and to use the meeting to coordinate activities, share latest > results, and so forth. That sounds like a great plan to me. There's a *ton* of work to do and more than enough to go around! I'm really excited by the response we've gotten. Not sure if google hangouts will be able to accommodate the number of people! > > sage >