From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yocto@mindchasers.com>
Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118)
	id E021CE006DB; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	yocto-www.yoctoproject.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	*      [score: 0.0000]
Received: from smtp.webfaction.com (mail6.webfaction.com [74.55.86.74])
	by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C23E0056A
	for <meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>;
	Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.10] (c-68-38-40-177.hsd1.nj.comcast.net
	[68.38.40.177])
	by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065D222961E6
	for <meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>;
	Fri, 26 Sep 2014 18:17:15 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5425ADAA.9040905@mindchasers.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 14:17:14 -0400
From: Bob Cochran <yocto@mindchasers.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" <meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>
References: <5424EDA6.3070800@mindchasers.com>
In-Reply-To: <5424EDA6.3070800@mindchasers.com>
Subject: Re: linux-qoriq: why does t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig define CONFIG_ALTIVEC?
X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers
	<meta-freescale.yoctoproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/options/meta-freescale>,
	<mailto:meta-freescale-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale>
List-Post: <mailto:meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:meta-freescale-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale>,
	<mailto:meta-freescale-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 18:17:27 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 09/26/2014 12:37 AM, Bob Cochran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> T1040 uses an E5500, and E5500 doesn't have ALTIVEC.
>
> However, the 64-bit def config file (configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig)
> in the FSL Linux tree pulled by linux-qoriq recipe has
>
> CONFIG_ALTIVEC=y
>
> I assume I should submit a patch to remove this, but please let me know
> if I should be setting other configs in its place.

I just noticed that CONFIG_FMAN_V3L isn't set in the T1040 def config 
files (t1040_32bit_smp_defconfig  and t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig)

My RDB kernel image is obviously in need of a config patch considering 
this and that it's pulling in some T4240 integration errata (see 
previous email I sent on this list).

I hope to have a patch next week to get my RDB network running a little 
smoother.


>
> I'll test it tomorrow if I can get some guidance overnight.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bob
>