Re: [PATCH] wireless: Remove unnessary write over of register 11 in rt2800lib.c

[nick <yocto6-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

On 14-09-28 08:24 AM, nick wrote:
> 
> 
> On 14-09-28 04:05 AM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>> Or someone with the hardware has to test and check that...
>>
>> On 9/28/14, Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 05:11:41PM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>>>> This removes the unnecessary  overwrite of register 11 in the function,
>>>> rt2800_config_channel as we are already writing a correct value to the
>>>> register with rt2800_rfcsr_write(rt2x00dev,11.rfcsr).
>>> What make you sure that overwrite is unnecessary ?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <yocto6-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 2 --
>>>>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
>>>> b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
>>>> index 893c9d5..fb0ae38 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
>>>> @@ -2787,8 +2787,6 @@ static void rt2800_config_channel_rf55xx(struct
>>>> rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev,
>>>>
>>>>  	if (rf->channel <= 14) {
>>>>  		rt2800_rfcsr_write(rt2x00dev, 10, 0x90);
>>>> -		/* FIXME: RF11 owerwrite ? */
>>>> -		rt2800_rfcsr_write(rt2x00dev, 11, 0x4A);
>>> We need a prove that remove is correct, i.e. some reference to
>>> vendor code or spec that current writing register twice with
>>> different values is wrong.
>>>
>>> NACK for the patch.
>>>
>>> Stanislaw
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
> I will see if I can either find the vendor code or spec in order to do this correctly. Thanks for the reply
> through.
> Nick 
> 
In addition someone banned me from the list yet again. I am getting rather annoyed with this and can someone 
please remove it.
Cheers Nick