From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/38] libata: use __scsi_print_command() Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 16:10:30 +0200 Message-ID: <54296856.2020104@suse.de> References: <1411991947-130166-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <1411991947-130166-34-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <20140929140606.GB15925@htj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:34557 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754454AbaI2OKc (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:10:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140929140606.GB15925@htj.dyndns.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: James Bottomley , Christoph Hellwig , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Robert Elliott , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, LKML On 09/29/2014 04:06 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:59:02PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> libata already uses an internal buffer, so we should be using >> __scsi_print_command() here. >> >> Cc: Tejun Heo >> Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: LKML >> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke >=20 > Applied to libata/for-3.18. >=20 > Thanks. >=20 Errm. Nice that you did, but it sort of relies for patches 01-32 to be applied previously. I'd rather apply your Signed-off-by: to the patch and have it routed through the SCSI tree; that way we're sure it'll only be applied if the previous patches are in. Can you please pull it from libata to avoid build issues? Cheers, Hannes --=20 Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imend=F6rffer, HRB 16746 (AG N=FCrnberg)