All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Journal under-reservation bug on first >2G file
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:10:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <542B1C38.9010409@redhat.com> (raw)

Hey all -

So the following testcase will overrun the 1-credit journal reservation
made during a delalloc write in ext4_da_write_begin(), because we
may cross the 2G threshold, and need to modify both the inode and the
superblock in the same transaction.

I see a few was to fix this:

1) Always set LARGE_FILE on mount if not set.  This will break
   RW compatiblity with very old kernels.  Do we care?
2) Bump the reservation to 2 under the fiddly condition of
   large file not yet set but this write might do it
3) bump the delalloc reservation to 2 just in case, always

I'll be happy to write the patch to fix it, just wondering what
people think the best approach is

Thoughts?
-Eric


#!/bin/bash

# A 400m fs won't get the large_file feature, oddly
# enough, because the resize inode will be < 2G.

truncate --size=400m test.img
mkfs.ext4 -F test.img
# This shouldn't have large_file set, exit if it does for some reason
dumpe2fs -h test.img | grep large_file && exit

mkdir -p mnt
mount -o loop test.img mnt

echo "writing 1 byte at 2147483646" 
dd if=/dev/zero of=mnt/testfile bs=1 seek=2147483646 count=1 conv=notrunc of=mnt/testfile
sync

# This will make sure i_disksize is on disk, and
# that the buffer will be mapped on the next write.
#
# This is critical because ext4_da_should_update_i_disksize()
# checks buffer_mapped():
#
#        if (!buffer_mapped(bh) || (buffer_delay(bh)) || buffer_unwritten(bh))
#                return 0;
#        return 1;

# This tries to update i_disksize, and also requires a superblock
# update for the large_file feature flag, but only has 1 credit
# available on the delalloc write path

echo "writing 1 byte at 2147483647"
dd if=/dev/zero of=mnt/testfile bs=1 seek=2147483647 count=1 conv=notrunc of=mnt/testfile

# Should go boom, but if not, unmount
umount mnt

             reply	other threads:[~2014-09-30 21:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-30 21:10 Eric Sandeen [this message]
2014-09-30 21:22 ` Journal under-reservation bug on first >2G file Eric Sandeen
2014-09-30 21:36   ` Andreas Dilger
2014-09-30 22:10     ` Darrick J. Wong
2014-10-01 11:53     ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-10-01 14:43       ` Eric Sandeen
2014-10-01 19:59         ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-10-01 20:37           ` Eric Sandeen
2014-10-01 22:43             ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-10-02  5:49               ` Eric Sandeen
2014-10-02 11:26                 ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=542B1C38.9010409@redhat.com \
    --to=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.