From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751478AbaJAHyf (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2014 03:54:35 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]:37842 "EHLO mail-wi0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750981AbaJAHy3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2014 03:54:29 -0400 Message-ID: <542BB331.6020308@suse.cz> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 09:54:25 +0200 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Satoru Takeuchi , Guenter Roeck CC: stable@vger.kernel.org, shuah.kh@samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/142] 3.12.29-stable review References: <20140926154536.GA7174@roeck-us.net> <87lhp4enlp.wl%satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87lhp4enlp.wl%satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/27/2014, 11:54 PM, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > At Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:45:36 -0700, > Guenter Roeck wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:45:33AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.29 release. >>> There are 142 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Tue Sep 30 11:45:24 CEST 2014. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >> >> Hi Jiri, >> >> Build results: >> total: 135 pass: 135 fail: 0 >> >> Qemu test results: >> total: 21 pass: 21 fail: 0 > > Plus, this kernel passed my test. On 09/29/2014, 06:52 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: > Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions. Hi, and thanks to all of you. >> Both obviously look good, however my tree doesn't match your review request. >> It includes 245 patches instead of just 142. It is because I went wild and already uploaded 3.12.30-rc1 (aka performance release). >> Looks like your tree is a bit ahead of time, so I guess that is ok. >> Is there a way for me to avoid this when pulling in your pending changes ? >> So far I pull the changes from the stable-3.12-queue branch in your >> repository at kernel.org. Yeah, it is fine. You will receive a 30-rc1 message in a minute. (And if you tested the stable-queue already, no need to retest :).) thanks, -- js suse labs