From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] scsi: stop passing a gfp_mask argument down the command setup path
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 14:28:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <542BF38A.9040509@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1410107469-896-5-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>
On 09/07/14 18:31, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> There is no reason for ULDs to pass in a flag on how to allocate the S/G
> lists. While we don't need GFP_ATOMIC for the blk-mq case because we
> don't hold locks, that decision can be made way down the chain without
> having to pass a pointless gfp_mask argument.
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-01 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-07 16:31 I/O path cleanup Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-07 16:31 ` [PATCH 1/8] scsi: don't use scsi_next_command in scsi_reset_provider Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-01 12:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-09-07 16:31 ` [PATCH 2/8] scsi: remove scsi_next_command Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-01 12:06 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-09-07 16:31 ` [PATCH 3/8] scsi: clean up S/G table freeing Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-01 12:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-10-01 21:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-07 16:31 ` [PATCH 4/8] scsi: stop passing a gfp_mask argument down the command setup path Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-01 12:28 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2014-09-07 16:31 ` [PATCH 5/8] scsi: move scsi_dispatch_cmd to scsi_lib.c Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-01 12:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-09-07 16:31 ` [PATCH 6/8] scsi: move more requeue handling into scsi_requeue_command Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-01 12:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-09-07 16:31 ` [PATCH 7/8] scsi: split error handling slow path out of scsi_io_completion Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-01 12:46 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-09-07 16:31 ` [PATCH 8/8] scsi: merge scsi_finish_command and scsi_io_completion Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-01 12:55 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-09-08 7:22 ` I/O path cleanup Bart Van Assche
2014-09-08 15:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-30 13:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-09-30 13:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=542BF38A.9040509@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.