From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: elfring@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring)
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 19:09:20 +0200
Subject: [Cocci] Searching for pass-through functions
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410051900090.2022@localhost6.localdomain6>
References: <54303340.3090901@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410042116320.2079@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <54305719.1050304@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410042331240.2079@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <54312F70.3080809@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410051347570.2229@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <54313662.8000402@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410051729480.2022@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <54317410.6040605@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410051842280.2022@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <5431781F.8040807@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410051900090.2022@localhost6.localdomain6>
Message-ID: <54317B40.3010305@users.sourceforge.net>
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr

> At least the first one has a lot of nested loops and conditionals.
> This is a case that Coccinelle does not handle well.

I am curious if the chances will increase to improve this detail in the future.


>> - Can the software situation be improved for the other two issues?
> 
> Probably for the lexer.  Perhaps not for the case of inconsistent paths.  
> Again that relates to a particular kind of code structure.

I am also curious about how the software development will be continued for these
update candidates.

Regards,
Markus